It is to be expected that when someone is mistreated that he should ask after God's justice, but when that same man errs himself he wants less justice and more mercy. It being one thing to clamor for the prosecution of the man who speeds past you on the highway, but you must also acknowledge the same man will find it perfectly reasonable - and even desirable - to be given a warning in lieu of a ticket for his own speeding. Mercy is a strange thing. We find it natural when applied to ourselves, but difficult to cultivate in response to the actions of others. And we can apply this "self" to people we identify with and those deserving what we perceived justice for those who we do not.
So it is that a Catholic priest attempted to tackle this interplay of justice with mercy and got burned. He called for societal reflection and personal introspection, and was punished for not saying the right words in the right order. A chaplain's role is not that of the shaman's rote incantations. His role is in no small part to tackle the difficulties of right now and apply them to the timeless wisdom of God and His Church. That is rightfully going to prove uncomfortable. MIT didn't want to be discomfited and opted for a bubble of silence in an ocean roaring waves.
The problem is that such a unity of opinion doesn't exist. There are people who believe that racism is systemic, that our nation at its core is irredeemably unfair, and that the only answer is to tear it all down and build something new. There are people who believe people with long rap sheets are being released too easily already and so a knee on the neck is a reasonable and "just" response. And there are people who believe all this has nothing to do with them and they deserve to be left alone. We as a people don't agree. There must be a national dialogue before we are so far apart that we can no longer even hear each other. Perfect justice and perfect mercy are impossible on this side of heaven, but we are obliged to seek after those things according to God's plan.
Our path to the other side of this maze is not obvious. Pulling people such as this cleric out of his position as he tries to navigate towards a solution is done in the name of some perverse justice, at the expense of peace, and in the absence of mercy.
(GetReligion) - Earlier this year, a Catholic priest published a book entitled "Mercy: What Every Catholic Should Know," focusing on doctrine and discipleship issues that, ordinarily, would not cause controversy.But these are not ordinary times. Acting as a Catholic chaplain at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Father Daniel Moloney tried to apply his words about mercy and justice to the firestorm of protests and violence unleashed by the killing of George Floyd by a white Minneapolis police officer.In the end, the priest resigned at the request of the Archdiocese of Boston, in response to MIT administration claims that Moloney, in a June 7 email, violated a campus policy prohibiting "actions or statements that diminish the value of individuals or groups of people."Moloney wrote, in a meditation that defied simplistic soundbites: "George Floyd was killed by a police officer, and shouldn't have been. He had not lived a virtuous life. He was convicted of several crimes, including armed robbery. … And he was high on drugs at the time of his arrest."But we do not kill such people. He committed sins, but we root for sinners to change their lives and convert to the Gospel. Catholics want all life protected from conception until natural death."Criminals have human dignity and deserve justice and mercy, the priest said. This is why Catholics are "asked to work to abolish the death penalty in this country."On the other side of this painful equation, wrote Moloney, police officers struggle with issues of sin, anger and prejudice. Their work "often hardens them" in ways that cause "a cost to their souls." Real dangers can fuel attitudes that are "unjust and sinful," including racism.In a passage stressed by critics, the priest wrote that the officer who knelt on Floyd's neck "until he died acted wrongly. … The charges filed against him allege dangerous negligence, but say nothing about his state of mind. … But he showed disregard for his life, and we cannot accept that in our law enforcement officers. It is right that he has been arrested and will be prosecuted."In the wake of George Floyd's death, most people in the country have framed this as an act of racism. I don't think we know that."An editor who has worked with Moloney stressed that the scholarly priest – with degrees from Yale University, Rome's Pontifical University of the Holy Cross and a doctorate from the University of Notre Dame – is a precise writer.Thus, it's important to note what he was "actually saying and, equally important, what he was not saying," noted Joseph Pearce, in The Catholic World Report. "He wasn't saying, as some have alleged by misquoting him, that George Floyd's death was not an act of racism. He was simply saying that we don't know whether it was racist."Citing Catholic teachings, the priest noted that "racism is a sin. … So is rash judgment." The email ended with these words: "Blessed are the peacemakers, our Lord tells us. May we all be counted among them."In an online post the day before writing the fateful email, entitled "Mercy in a time of national anger," Moloney said that it helps to remember that leaders of the Civil Rights Movement – especially the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. – struggled to obtain justice, but also sought to "cultivate mercy."Right now, Americans are shouting at one another – or worse – about politics, class struggle and violence."Some people think that the right thing to do is to enact reforms of the police; others think that the right thing to do is to kill the police and bomb the precinct," wrote Moloney. "Some people think that nonviolent protests are an appropriate response; others think that injustice justifies robbing the local Target. Some people are satisfied when the bad cops are arrested, prosecuted and convicted; others want to overthrow the government. Some are just so upset that they don't know what to do."All agree that something deeply wrong happened to George Floyd, but our consensus stops there, at the level of justice. Mercy is the virtue that comes into play when things go wrong. Once we decide that something is unjust, we still have to decide what is the right thing to do."
We have already begun the Jacobin phase of the revolution IMO. To save oneself it has already become fashionable to accuse oneself of all sorts of ideological sins and metaphorically prostrate oneself before the mob.
ReplyDeleteThere is no common ground any more because "we all like sheep have gone astray everyone to his own way"
We can not agree on what it means to be human. That is entirely up to each humanoid unit.
In the end, the priest was guilty of going against the mainstream narrative that Floyd's death may not have had anything to do with race other than the skin color of the cop vs. the skin color of Floyd.
ReplyDeleteEverything else the priest said wasn't anything controversial at all! At least it wouldn't have been in an era in which justice was accepted.
Long live Mr. Putin!
ReplyDeleteOur host says:
ReplyDelete" We as a people don't agree. There must be a national dialogue before we are so far apart that we can no longer even hear each other..."
It's too late. Like Mr. Bauman says there is no recognition of unity, no common humanity. C.S.Lewis recognized that our humanity has been *destroyed*. Dialogue can only take place between humans.
This is not to say that Providence will not mercifully keep "the country" or "the culture" from violent destruction in the short term, it's just to acknowledge that dialogue - communication - requires prerequisite that are not present in our circumstances.
We need more explicit questioning of the Racist Orthodoxy, not less...
ReplyDelete"...Pulling people such as this cleric out of his position as he tries to navigate towards a solution is done in the name of some perverse justice, at the expense of peace, and in the absence of mercy..."
ReplyDeleteModerninities morality, logically and coherently following its flat metaphysics of world/life, is merciless. Mercy only makes sense in a hierarchy. Modernity believes not in hierarchy, but "equality", and anything less is a moral failure and betrayal.
Christian (or any other kind really) hierarchy, and thus sin/mercy/redemption has no place in such a worldview, at least not as anything more than a "personal comfort" to those less enlighted.
Of course, too many of us Christians (as individuals, as the institutional church, as "a religion", as "Orthodoxy") are trying to reconcile such secular flatness/mercilessness with Christianity. What is the fruit beyond compromise which leads to faithlessness? Living at peace with destroyed humanity does not mean being "in dialogue" with them, trying to insert ourselves into their Cathedrals (such as MIT). Rather, it looks more like what goes by 'Benedict Option' today...
No, some sort of therapeutic "listening" is going to make modernity into something it is not. It also is not Christianity - we don't "listen" to the devil - on the contrary our healing comes from NOT listening.
ReplyDeleteSometimes you have to let the soup can be a soup can, and not try to make it into something it is not. Some things are best left up to God...
ReplyDeleteDavid B.
ReplyDeleteI don't believe the good Catholic priest was being idealistic, reducing others to "isms", or anything like that. He was speaking the truth - any therapeutic 'listening' detached from the truth can not further the Gospel or heal ourselves/others because it is then just an "insipid attempt at solidarity" or something similar. Your criticism of the priest does not ring true.
Sometimes, the Devil and 'the world' act on their own and "we", as Traditional Christians, did not do anything, participate, etc. If I were to identify a sin on the part of the good priest and "us", it would be not understanding (not listening one could say) to history, to the culture, and how it has becoming and already become anti-christian, anti-human, and not capable of "dialogue". There is a vanity in a Christian priest being a Chaplin in a High Cathedral of Secularism like MIT. When he spoke the truth to them about Racism they purged him, because that is what the darkness does. The light is not "responsible" for this as you say...
David B,
ReplyDeleteIt is not a sin to recognize sin - on the contrary, it is necessary for repentance/healing. Recognizing the Icon of Christ in everyone does not preclude us recognizing that they are, ontologically, soup cans in their and our present circumstances in this age. You seem to be pitting truth against truth with your emphasis.
Two thoughts:
ReplyDelete1) A basic understanding of even recent history (let alone human {fallen} nature) reveals that "what they are doing in the streets" is a fairly common (if cyclical) phenomena - at bottom a spiritual longing and restlessness. The Roman state ran the gladiatorial games precisely to satisfy the various vague (yet strong) emotional and spiritual dissatisfaction of the general populace. "What were they doing in the streets" in the sixties, or the thirties, or during the Great Awakenings? I am wondering out loud if you are not attaching a significance to "being in the streets" that is in error, or thinking that the good priests or a Christian understanding/critique of this phenomena is a shallow "cultural war" knee-jerk like reaction. I see no such shallowness in the good priests attempt to speak the truth to a certain (and false) racialist orthodoxy. You admit we are being manipulated by principalities and powers, so why do you keep bringing up this simplistic reduction of "cultural war" in relation to what this priest said?
1) Therapeutic listening and "connecting" is not the end all and be all of Christian truth. Speaking of movies, your reminding me a bit of Sybok, Spocks half brother in Star Trek V, who is has the ability to listen (through a mind meld) and "heal the innermost pain of any individual". He seeks God, except he finds the Devil instead and through an act of arrogance and self sacrifice he minds meld with this evil spirit destroying himself (but allowing Spock and the others to escape).
All this to say is that I don't think "cultural war/hardness o hearts" is all that useful here.
Ha, you remember more detail from that movie than I did - Kirk's admonition. It really was a bad movie ;)
ReplyDeleteI was born and raised in small town Oklahoma. I vividly recall the causal racism (and less talked about, sexism) of my youth. "What are these chains in your truck for grandpa?" I said one day. "For the n#g@^rs" is the deadpan and sincere reply. Yet, by the my late teens (this would be late 1980's) these attitudes are no longer generally acceptable, they are however sometimes, by some, muttered under the breath. By the early 1990's however they are not acceptable at all (though the sexism is lagging behind the racism a bit). By the twentieth century you might as well have a Nazi flag tattooed on your forehead if you even whisper the smallest expression of one of these attitudes -cyou would be a true societal outcast without a job, friends, and possibly even your own family. I lived in the South for most of my life - Oklahoma, Kentucky, Louisiana, Georgia, Texas, and North Carolina. Only in the last dozen years have I lived outside of it here in New Mexico (i.e. the "Hispanic" West).
ReplyDeleteI say all this to agree with you, the generational sin of slavery is very real and I am all too aware of it. However, am I going to "listen" to the false Marxist narrative/anthropology of "critical race theory" and Black Lives Matter? Am I going to "listen" to those who are certain that the officer who killed George Floyd was an ideological, reflexive racist when he what he really is in all probability is a burned out PTSD sufferer, as much a victim of our broken "justice system" as the rest of us?
On the one hand you seem to understand the generational depth of these particular sins and sin in general, but you on the other hand you want traditional Christianity, who are now a small and uninfluential minority (honestly, what are we, 15%? That's to high. 10%? Still too high likely) to do what exactly?
Or, are you saying you want non/post/anti Christian majority America to...do what? suddenly embrace the truth of sin and the narrative of Christianity, which up until now (this very day -this very minute) they explicitly reject in all their words and the very life they live?!?
Before talk and "dialogue" and "conversation" there are the hard facts of what people actually are in all their formation, habits, and lived life. Communication - communion - only happens between people who have been prepared for it, formed for it, and have *suffered* for it. As you point out, even most of what's left of "Christian America" is not ready for it, to say nothing of most of the rest.
As for those on the street? I suspect most of them are too young to actually have experienced what I experienced, or have a clue as to the real depth of these sins and what a nation, people, and culture has to do to actually heal. Most of them are pawns of spirits (and the media) they don't even acknowledge exist - I am not going to "listen" to them and neither should you, because there is no healing to be found in it.
In any case, I appreciate what you are saying and your central point. I just don't think you go far enough into the reality of the what it means.
David:
ReplyDeleteNone of what you are saying really applies at the State-sovereign plane. Secular democracies don't have symphonia.
The current American ontological and existential conflict can't end in agreeing to disagree. Those questions were settled when the country was founded. After that you're just supposed to argue over bureaucratic pay, the roads, war on Japan, etc. If they do come up again, like they did in the US Civil War, then you start a new country. Hence, we have begun the process of several countries trying to be born where the old Protestant, Anglo-European one formerly existed.
Your advice, while certainly worthy on the individual plane, bespeaks Christian retreat from the American public square. That is, as the public square becomes wholly atheistic and hostile, Christians retreat to a safe space of individual praxis and piety, ceding the fight for the collective nation. Indeed, Orthodox Christianity is so far removed from modern American discourse it might as well be Sufism.
There is great appeal in this to the modern Christian who imagines himself like St. Paul speaking truth to Agrippa. But it's an ahistorical view: the Christians didn't withdraw from the Empire, they became the Empire. From the standpoint of modernity, Empire is regarded as a corrupting influence so modern Christians preach the purity of the Age of Martyrdom, meeting in the catacombs and running from Diocletian. Again, this is an ahistorical perspective and also ignores the Church's entire ecclesiology.
So we are at an uncomfortable junction: either modernity is wrong or we are wrong and we just need to become quiet congregationalist sects.
Don't ask the bishops how this all works out; they don't know.
Where is the support for radical individualism in the Tradition?
ReplyDeleteI'll simplify it for you: Christianity needs a Christendom. There is no compromise to be had with the secular, atheistic State.
ReplyDeleteYou're overlooking something else: the BLM movement doesn't want human dignity; they just want your stuff.
We already know what they want: stuff, so they loot, and autonomy, so they set up police-free zones where they can get on with the important business of drugs, guns and sex. And no statues of dead old white men around to spoil the fun. As you observe, ideology is for the talking heads.
ReplyDeleteI don't think you grasp that we have already provided these people with all the necessities of life. That's why they have plenty of spare calories to riot and set up CHAZ/CHOP. Now you see why Universal Basic Income can't work and we can't have nice things: the takers never stop taking.
I also reject your premise of Christendom as a "spotty" record. On the contrary, it rivals the Greek Classical era for refinement and human advancement. It will take numerous generations to restore, which is why Christians should concentrate on growing the Faith in their own pews. Then the evangelists have something to tell people to "come and see."
I do agree that America is an apostate nation and is being punished as such. I could say much more but I have regard for our host.
I also reject your notion of inter-generational guilt. Are you really going to tax yourself and your children and grandchildren for things that happened before you were born? But if we're going to go down that road here's an idea: restrict the prescriptive measures of Title VII solely to the benefit of Americans who are descended from African slaves or Natives. Also, an immigration moratorium to increase their bargaining power for jobs, housing and education. But these run counter to a lot of elite objectives so they won't happen.
You really need to stop groveling.
ReplyDeleteThere will be hard conversations. Priests will be blessing militias by the time this thing runs its course.