I was teaching a class to catechumens today after Liturgy and, as I am wont to do, I got into an historical analysis of the Liturgy with particular interest in when and why things were added or changed. There are a number of good books on this topic, but no one text really covers it all. That said, it's an enjoyable journey to see how things evolved over time and the reasons behind them. Emperors get their way as you might guess, heresies arise, things get abbreviated, older practices get repurposed, and some things just fade away completely. What makes this an even more dense conversation is that there is no singular liturgy in use in this country. Certainly the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom is done everywhere, but every parishioner who attends a Greek parish one weekend and an OCA parish the next weekend can see great variety in practice. My parish has a lot of visitors every weekend and a number of college students. Neither group is shy in asking, "Father, why don't you do X? My old church did it every Sunday. Can you do it, too?" The answer is almost always no. Two hundred years from now there might be one consistent liturgical practice in this country, but at present throwing in a bit from Romania, a pinch from Serbia, and a dash for Antioch is going to get me a poke from the chancery.
Here's an article from Archpriest Andrei Ukhtomsky on this topic. I think you'll enjoy it.
(OrthoChristian) - The Rite of Divine Liturgy in its most basic form—reading the Holy Scriptures, prayers for the living, prayers over the Gifts, and finally, Holy Communion—had already taken shape in the first century.
The majority of the prayers and priestly actions entered into the rite of the Liturgy by the sixth century. Further development of the Liturgical rite was associated with the refinement of the expression of our faith in connection with historical conditions and heterodox influence. Below, historical information is presented on the development of certain parts of the Liturgy in order to give a more meaningful picture of what is happening during the main service of the Orthodox Church.
The Liturgy of the Word
Great Litany—from the eleventh century. In the petition for the Primate of the Church, the Church of Greece commemorates only the local Bishop, and not the entire Holy Synod, following the principle of submission to one (their own, local) bishop.
The Antiphons—all three from the eighth century. There were different ones for weekdays and Sundays.
The Trisagion—the Holy Fathers mentioned it from the fourth century; it was part of the Liturgy from the fifth century, and it reached its unchanged form by the sixth century.
The exclamation “Lord save the pious” was a patriarchal glorification of the emperor. A similar form can be found by 1580. In Greece, from the eighteenth century, and in the Russian Orthodox Church, it was practiced exclusively during hierarchical liturgies. However, in priestly service books,1 this exclamation appeared on the territory of South-Western Rus’2 from the seventeenth century;3 in Moscow, it began to be used from 1655. During the Soviet era, the exclamation was excluded from use, due to its origin from the glorification of the emperor. In practice, it began to be used between 1970–1980. Since 1990, it was present at both hierarchical and priestly liturgies. Since 1996 it entered into the service book.4 Here is an example of something many people who attend a Slavic parish would assume to be both ancient and universal. In fact, most parishes in the US do not do it all.
The Alleluia [after the Epistle reading] is first encountered in a seventh-century Georgian lectionary compiled in Jerusalem. In Rus’ it began to be used between the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Its function is the same as the Prokeimenon, to draw focus on the Word of God. The censing [with incense] during the reading of the Epistle in the twelfth to thirteenth centuries, led to the decline of the reading of the Alleluia in the Greek Church. If you read a modern liturgy book, there will often be a footnote mentioning how little time is available to the person censing and that it should be moved here or there. There is in fact very wide variety on when the censing is done, what is censed, and even the amount of noise is involved. The Alleluia - or lack thereof - is similarly quite varied.
The Augmented Litany [Litany of Fervent Supplication] is known from the “Apostolic Constitutions” (third to fourth century). In the Greek Church in the nineteenth to twentieth centuries, at parish services, after the Gospel immediately would follow the exclamation, “That always being guarded by Your might…”5 everything previous is omitted. This omission is associated with saving time, since the Liturgy was celebrated with midnight office, matins, and hours. It is worth noting that the latest Greek Archdiocese approved text for the Liturgy has added back in many items, though marked off and not normally done in parish practice.
The Greeks have no litany for the departed, and, according to Archpriest John Meyendorff, they never had. [It is found in] the manuscripts we have from the fourteenth century—the Nikonian reformers6 replaced the text of this litany, with a litany of the departed, taken from the order of the burial of the laity. Since 1665, this litany has remained unchanged. This litany is read when an offering is brought for the dead.
The Litany of the Catechumens
The Liturgy of the Faithful
The Great Entrance symbolizes the procession of Jesus Christ to the death on the Cross. The great entrance was originally made by one deacon without singing. From the sixth century, influenced by the liturgical tradition of the Great Church Hagia Sophia of Constantinople,7 the Great Entrance became majestic and solemn. The Cherubic Hymn (The Cherubicon) became known from the sixth century. In the Church of Greece, during the Great Entrance, priests process around one side of the church, reaching the narthex, (which in ancient times served as a skeuophylakion)8, and coming up the center of the church towards the ambo. In connection with the increase [in number] of priests, petitions arose at the Entrance. The response: “And all of you [Orthodox Christians], may the Lord God remember in his kingdom…” is known from the thirteenth century. From the fourteenth century, the commemoration of emperors and the Patriarch appeared. In the case of them being present, the commemoration was said aloud; in their absence, it was said quietly. In some parishes this entrance can be quite long with many groups mentioned and in others quite short and only the single remembrance is said aloud. For priests used to doing the longer version it becomes a memorized portion of the service and for those not from such a tradition, it is as simple as walking out of the altar and right back in. Additionally, the laity have developed many different practices related to this entrance; touching the priest's garments, prayers said quietly in response, etc.
The commemoration of the Czars and the Patriarchs aloud appeared in South-Western Rus’. It was known by the [Kievan] Service Books of 1629 and 1639 [of St. Peter Mohyla—Trans.] Until the nineteenth century in Greek liturgical books, there was no private commemoration. The formula “And all of you [Orthodox Christians]” is ancient and indicates the commemoration of the people. The formula “all of us…” speaks to the fact that both the priests, clergy, and lay people need to be commemorated. Since 1723, the Holy Synod began to be commemorated. Since 904, the commemoration of the diocesan bishop was introduced. There is a common process by which things originally directed at the emperor got redirected to the people. Orthodoxy is often much more willing to pivot than to throw anything away.
The formula “and all of you Orthodox Christians…”9 appears in the 1958 service book. The formula “You…and all Orthodox Christians…”10 11 appears in the 1977 service book, and reflects the new atmosphere in the Moscow Patriarchate, as a result of ecumenist inter-Christian and inter-Orthodox dialogue, when in the church, there may not only be Orthodox Christians, but also Catholics and Protestants. This addition into the text of the commemoration of bishops and priests in parentheses may be omitted by other priests.
The words of the Dialogue after the Cherubic Hymn and Great Entrance between the deacon and the priest: “Pray for me, brother and concelebrant.” were earlier uttered by a Hierarch, addressing his concelebrants [often other hierarchs in the Great Church—Trans.], and they answered with the words of Our Lady from the Magnificat, in the Gospel of Luke (1:35): The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee. The problem arose in a situation of a single priest serving with a deacon. Who should say these words to whom? Both possible options were tried, which is reflected in manuscripts.12 It is interesting to note that, given the relative rarity of deacons in this country, that many of the dialogues between priests and deacons are simply missing from liturgy books. Newer versions have reintroduced them, but many of the older texts are still in daily use.
The exclamation “The Doors, the Doors…” is an instruction to the gatekeepers to guard the doors locked.13 There has been some discussion of the spiritual significance of this as well. In some traditions the idea of barring the doors has given way to repurposing the statement to signify the open doors to the kingdom. To that end some will open the holy gates at this time.
Prior to the Creed, the Altar Curtain14 is drawn open. The curtain appeared in the services of Constantinople from around the eleventh century. In Northern Syria, the iconostasis and curtain appear by the fifth century. The waving of the Aër15 [like a canopy] over the gifts during the singing of the Creed is carried out only during conciliar service [with other clergy]; if a priest serves alone, the Aër is instead held above the gifts vertically. And of course some parishes have no curtains and others never close the doors at all during services. You might also have no idea what he is talking about here when he mentions the aer or the different ways of moving it. Look up hierarchical liturgy and then watch a normal Sunday liturgy on YouTube.
The exclamation of the priest, “Let us give thanks unto the Lord.” has been in use since the third century.
The final exclamation after the words of institution,16 “In behalf of all…”17 relates to the subject of the secret prayer said just before, “Mindful therefore, of this saving commandment and all those things which came to pass for us…”18 The words “and for all.” are said with undying gratitude for all the good things God has done for us, especially for salvation through Christ.
The Troparion of the Third Hour,19 and the verses of Psalm 5020 were introduced from the sixteenth century, as part of the Russian Orthodox Church’s polemics against the Roman Catholic church, in order to more clearly show the time of the descent of the Holy Spirit and the consecration of the Gifts.
The supplicatory Litany Before the Lord’s Prayer was known from the eighth century.
Personal prayers before Holy Communion were used from the tenth century. Earlier in Constantinople, in the Great Church of Hagia Sophia, they used the prayer, “Of thy mystical supper…”, which dates back to the sixth century. An increase in prayers is found in Greek manuscripts from the seventeenth to eighteenth centuries.
The words, “Blessed is he that cometh in the Name of the Lord; God is the Lord and hath appeared unto us.” appearing just before approaching Holy Communion serve as a declaration that Jesus Christ comes to us in the gifts.
The zapivka21 after Holy Communion was added during the time of St. John Chrysostom, who, due to a stomach ailment, ate a barley pita22 on the patriarchal throne. Due to the authority of the saint, such a practice spread further. Zapivka is not practiced everywhere. The handing out of antidoron is done at different times and in different methods from tradition to tradition. Truthfully, everything having to do with feeding people has variety; how people commune from the spoon even differs from group to group. In parishes where people from all over attend services some priests use memory to recall who is accustomed to what practice and other clergy will simply announce a singular method and establish uniformity.
The Prayer of the Ambo is found in the “Apostolic Constitutions”. In liturgical manuscripts of the eighth to sixteenth centuries, especially of southern Italian origin, about 100 prayers were known, not one among them of a Constantinopolitan origin, which indicates the absence of an alternative reading in Constantinople. Many prayers were used for great feast days, in which the prayer to God is associated with the meaning of the feast. Some parishes make use of many of them and others very, very few.
The thirty-third psalm was added to the Liturgy in the eleventh to twelfth centuries in Palestine, then in the Monastery of the “Theotokos the Benefactor” in Constantinople, and from there, it spread everywhere. In ancient times, it was sung during Communion.
The words of the Dismissal, “May Christ our true God…” appeared in the twelfth to thirteenth centuries. The modern form of the dismissal has been known since 1668. The Dismissal of weekdays in Rus’ arose in the fifteenth century.
The distribution of the antidoron is mentioned in the Apostolic Constitutions. The term antidoron [meaning “in place of the gifts”—Trans.] was introduced by St. Gregory of Dekapolis (†817) due to the practice of infrequent communion.
Archpriest Andrei Ukhtomsky,
Doctoral Candidate of Theology, Teacher of the Kiev Theological Academy
Translation by Matfey Shaheen
Pravlife.org
4/16/2020
1 As opposed to the Archieratikon, or the Bishop’s service book.
2 Generally speaking, referring to modern-day Ukraine and Belarus.
3 Many liturgical forms were developed by Saint Peter Mohyla, Metropolitan of Kiev during this period—Trans.
4 In the ROCOR, this form never ceased being used, however it is generally only said by the deacon, unlike in the MP.
5 “That being kept always under Thy dominion…” The exclamation immediately prior to the Cherubicon, after which the priest begins the secret prayer “None are worthy…” and the choir begins the Cherubic hymn. That exclamation originally belonged to the Hierarch or otherwise the highest serving cleric, and was not given to lower ranked priests, as may be differed today by the primary celebrant—Trans.
6 Referring to Patriarch Nikon and his reforms.
7 The Typicon of the Great Church (Hagia Sophia), is one of the three major typica extant in Orthodox history, the other being that of the Stoudios Monastery—the Studite Typicon, and of Sabbas the Sanctified—the Jerusalem Typicon, which became standard throughout the Russian Orthodox Church during the archepiscopacy of Met. Cyprian of Kiev and Moscow (the Bulgarian). The rite of the Great Church, or Hagia Sophia, is responsible for many of the more festal and elaborate elements within Orthodox liturgical practice—Trans.
8 Pronounced: Skevophylakion. In Greek: σχευοφυλαχιον, in Slavonic: сосудохранительница, was a special room, often located outside the church where the sacred vessels and liturgical utensils were kept until they were used in the liturgy, when they were brought in from outside by a single deacon, who was responsible for keeping them, as well as the bread being offered—Trans.
9 In Slavonic: “всех вас, православных христиан, да помянет…”
10 This situation mostly relates to variants of the Slavonic text as used in the Moscow Patriarchate. As a result, it does not make as much sense in English, however simply put, the second version “You…and all Orthodox Christians”, may have an ecumenicist undertone, in that it could be interpreted as implying whomever is in the Church (orthodox or otherwise), and also all Orthodox Christians, whereas the first form implies exclusively Orthodox Christians. In any event, this all applies to the nuances and translations of Slavonic, and looses its context in English.—Trans.
11 In Slavonic: “вас, и всех православных христиан…”
12 The generally agreed upon corrected form of this Dialog [occurring immediately after the great entrance and the placing of the gifts on the altar], as established in the service books of the Russian Church after 2003, and in most other local churches, is that the deacon must be the one to say to the Priest, “The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee”, and not the other way around. The reason being, it is natural for a priest, who is conducting the bloodless sacrifice, to be assured that the Holy Spirit will fall upon him. It is out of place, however, and above the station of a deacon to be told this, as it is not him making this sacrifice on behalf of Christ—who is The One truly offering, and The One being offered (see the prayer of the Cherubic Hymn). The version of the Dialog, in which a deacon would be told those words by the priest, is almost certainly an aberration; seeing as the form of this dialog was taken from the cathedral rite of the Great Church, in Constantinople, where bishops would constantly be serving, it would have been a bishop saying these words to another bishop or otherwise to his priest(s). In that situation, all the celebrants participating in the dialog are clothed with the grace of the (arch)priesthood, and therefore, it would be natural in either situation for this dialog to take place between them. However, when the typicon of the great church was adapted and used in regular parishes—where Celebrant A is a priest, but Celebrant B is only a deacon—the form from the cathedral rite loses its proper context, and we arrive at a moment when it appears as if the deacon is being blessed by the priest to conduct the sacrament, which is of course not intended, and an aberration.—Trans.
13 In ancient times, only the faithful were aloud to attend the eponymous Liturgy of the faithful—catechumens by this moment should have already left earlier, during the appropriate litany. However, at this moment, the gatekeepers were instructed to ensure that not a catechumen remained in the church, so that the most sacred mystery would only be celebrated by those already illumined.—Trans.
14 Καταπέτασμα/Katapetasma—Trans.
15 The outermost, largest of the veils which cover the chalice and diskos.
16 I.e. the words Jesus said at the last supper, echoed in Eucharistic consecration. In Slavonic these words are called: (Тайно)установительные слова; in Latin: verba institutionis. These words can be broadly considered as part of the same liturgical continuum as the Anamnesis, which in Orthodoxy comes before the Epiclesis, unlike the practice of the papists—Trans.
17 Full text: “Thine own of Thine own we offer unto Thee, in behalf of all, and for all.” These words are said after the Anamnesis, but before the Epiclesis—Trans.
18 Full text: “Mindful, therefore, of this saving commandment and all those things which came to pass for us: the cross, the grave, the resurrection on the third day, the ascension into the heavens, the session at the right hand, the second and glorious coming again.”
19 “O Lord, Who didst send down Thy most Holy Spirit at the third hour upon Thine apostles: Take Him not from us, O Good One, but renew Him in us who pray unto Thee.”
20 “Cast me not away from Thy presence, and take not Thy Holy Spirit from me.”
21 The mixture prepared from hot water and wine for communicants to drink with prosphora after having communed.
22 This seems to refer to a possibly unleavened, bland bred, to help with digestion after having fasted for a long time.
No comments:
Post a Comment