Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Once these nationalism-driven breakway churches are recognized as autonomous, and their existence becomes a fait accompli, this is all going to seem rather foolish.
ReplyDeleteThough I have a Sebrian Orthodox aquaintance who swears up and down the Macedonian Orthodox are totally without grace and well outside of Orthodoxy as they went independent from the Serbian Church.
The Serbians are hard-line all around. And I work with a Macedonian Orthodox that would firmly disagree of course. :) Do we want this sort of devolution of the Churches? Do we think it will make East-West discussions easier or harder?
ReplyDelete