Instead of juvenile barbs and droll witticisms, here's a link to commentary from Mere Comments
Bill Tighe provided this link from Times Online giving an inside look at the debate in the Church of England to consecrate "women bishops." Too bad they didn't have a discussion and review, first, of what is a bishop's job? Not tha administrative stuff, but the stuff about receiving the faith and passing it on exactly as received. Now if such a change isn't really about the faith at all and merely an administrative alteration, then there's no need to crow about a new step forward signalled to the gathered bishops by none other than the Holy Spirit. Of course, when you have female priests to begin with.... I've never been an "Anglican" but it's in my family background, and fifty years ago I would have felt at home there, perhaps. I find this long demise, decades in its unfolding, a very sad story.
The last line from that link from the Times Online was pithy:
Well nobody died, certainly not Christianity. All that has happened is a degree of reform has been achieved, and in the doing those who wanted it all their own way didn't get it and were surprised to find that they were not as important as they imagined.
And from a later article from the Times Online:
The Bishop of Ebbsfleet, the Rt Rev Andrew Burnham, is to lead his fellow Anglo-Catholics from the Church of England into the Roman Catholic Church, the Catholic Herald will reveal this week.
Bishop Burnham, one of two "flying bishops" in the province of Canterbury, has made a statement asking Pope Benedict XVI and the English Catholic bishops for "magnanimous gestures" that will allow traditionalists to become Catholics en masse.
He is confident that this will happen, following talks in Rome with Cardinal Levada, head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and Cardinal Kasper, the Vatican's head of ecumenism. He was accompanied on his visit by the Rt Rev Keith Newton, Bishop of Richborough, the other Canterbury "flying bishop", who is expected to follow his example.
Bishop Burnham hopes that Rome will offer special arrangements whereby former Anglicans can stay worshiping in parishes under the guidance of a Catholic bishop. Most of these parishes already use the Roman liturgy, but there may be provision for Anglican prayers if churches request it.
Anglican priests who are already married will not be barred from ordination as priests, though Bishop Burnham would not be able to continue in episcopal orders, as he is married and there is an absolute bar on married bishops in the Roman and Orthodox Churches.
In his statement, Bishop Burnham explains why he is rejecting the code of practice offered to traditionalists by the General Synod last night. "How could we trust a code of practice to deliver a workable ecclesiology if every suggestion we have made for our inclusion has been turned down flat?" he asks.
"How could we trust a code of practice when those who are offering it include those who have done most to undermine and seek to revoke the code of practice in force for these last 14 years? ...
"What we must humbly ask for now is for magnanimous gestures from our Catholic friends, especially from the Holy Father, who well understands our longing for unity, and from the hierarchy of England and Wales. Most of all we ask for ways that allow us to bring our folk with us."
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Mere Comments on Church of England tomfoolery
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We have been keeping an eye on the matter over at The Black Cordelias for a time now. Some of us have been asking if there will be a TAC/Anglican-Related Announcement post-Lambeth? for a time now.
ReplyDeleteI am of the thinking that something like "Summorum Pontificum" meets "The Pastoral Provision" is in the works... Rome would do well to sidestep a lot of the heel-dragging bishops who have NOT been generous with these folks. Liverpool comes to mind (exactly ZERO convert clergyman ordained!)