Monday, March 2, 2009

AOI delivers stinging editorial on Bishop Savas

(AOI) - Greek Orthodox Archbishop Demetrios announced yesterday that Bishop Savas of Troas, most recently the chancellor of the archdiocese, has been named director of the Office of Church and Society. The bishop will be charged with developing “programs and ministries that promote a creative Orthodox Christian engagement with contemporary societal and cultural realities.”

Readers of this blog will recall the effusive praise with which Bishop Savas greeted the election of Barack Obama, rejoicing that “this is the day that the Lord has made!” Yesterday, the Obama administration moved to rescind a Bush administration regulation, put in place in December, that cuts off federal funding for medical facilities that would force doctors, nurses and other health care workers to participate in practices, such as abortion, that “they feel violates their personal, moral or religious beliefs.” The move to lift the so-called “conscience rule,” which is subject to a 30 day public comment period, was applauded by pro-abortion activists and condemned by religious conservatives.

Perhaps the bishop, in his first official act, could issue a sharply worded statement and go on radio and TV to criticize the Obama administration for its attempt to overturn the health care “conscience rule” and pointing out how removing legal protections for religious belief in the workplace advances the culture of death. There’s a “contemporary societal and cultural” reality for you.

Perhaps Bishop Savas will work in unison with other Orthodox jurisdictions to present a united front on moral issues. For example, he could rally Greek metropolitans, bishops, priests, theologians, seminarians — and the laity — for a massive turnout at next year’s March for Life in Washington. And what about calling Orthodox Christian politicians to account for their votes on life issues?

Maybe that’s too much to expect. As outlined by the archbishop, the Office of Church and Society, which seems to have been dormant for some time, “will address matters of current relevance, such as the effects of online social networking, the popularity of so-called ‘reality’ television and video games, and the resurgence of atheism. It will also oversee the Archdiocesan Advisory Committee on Science and Technology (AACST) and will work closely with the Archdiocesan Youth Department.”

How does the “resurgence of atheism” fit into this mixed bag of priorities? It is unclear. A good place to start on the atheism project might be to focus on the advance of secularism and the threat it poses to faith communities, something Russian Orthodox hierarchs have spoken to very forcefully. Secularism is a threat that exists not only in the wider culture but within our own churches, and is greatly aggravated by the ethno-phyletism which breaks out in our communities like a genetic disorder. In the Greek church, that of course can be traced to phony “Hellenism” projects which have little to do with the theological or philosophical heritage of Hellenistic culture as it informed and strengthened Orthodox Christian doctrine. This sort of “Hellenism,” which is corrosive to the Christian call to evangelize and make disciples of all nations [Matt. 28:19], is really a secularized ethnic pride that seeks the “greekification” of the Church and uses it instrumentally to advance the objectives of the Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This phony “Hellenism” condemns the American Church to a perpetual diaspora mindset, generation upon generation.

But I digress. Let us pray for Bishop Savas and wish him success in bringing the moral witness of Orthodoxy to the Church and the wider culture. And let us hope that he takes on something much more ambitious than video games.

6 comments:

  1. Thank you for posting this Josephus. I think a combination of factors result in bishops trying to make themselves popular with authority and anyone "politically correct."

    I believe one factor is a unspoken insecurity within the baby boomer generation. They grew up as children of immigrants and- now that they are older and have more influence- they overcompensate for the same insecurities, still trying to prove they they aren't so different, still trying to soften and subdue the things that make them stand out from mainstream American culture.

    They have over the past 40 years tried to make their faith more "culturally accessible" by siding with the political left; celebrity photo ops; defying their priests and appealing to bishops just because they want to sing Christmas carols in church like their protestant friends; being afraid that their priests will be seen wearing a rasso in public; etc.

    This will only make them accessible to other aging baby-boomers at the country club or at the big political campaign dinner.

    Wear suit with collar in the inner city and you are a witness to nothing special. You will only have the satisfaction of a generation embarrassed by the old country.

    Wear a rasso and beard in the inner city and you will have the rapt attention of spiritually hungry generations X and Y.

    They have to ask themselves, which is more important?

    - David S., an Antiochian

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is something to be learned here from the Episcopalians specifically and all those within their churches of a similar mindset in general.

    When the Church tries to make itself like the fallen world it turns its peoples' eyes downward to the ground and all its uncertainties. When the church tries to bring its people to Heaven the people look upward with hope.

    Conformity seems to be a method chosen at the expense of Tradition. The irony is that this conformity is often an attempt to bring people to Tradition. People need to know Christianity is not another philosophy (political, social, or otherwise). It is not apples to apples. If anything it's apples to acorns. We save up our treasure for later instead of taking our bites now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. David,

    Please be careful not to issue sweeping generalizations that judge all priests who do not wear the rasso outside of church or a beard. Not every priest who wears a suit and shaves does so out of embarassment for Orthodoxy.

    Nor is it necesarily true that if you "Wear suit with collar in the inner city and you are a witness to nothing special. You will only have the satisfaction of a generation embarrassed by the old country."

    Even less guaranteed is that if you "Wear a rasso and beard in the inner city" ... "you will have the rapt attention of spiritually hungry generations X and Y."

    Remember St. Ephraim's prayer, particularly the third part.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah, I really need to relax. I had something specific on my mind when I wrote that. There are many convert priests that gave up prosperous ministries in order to become Orthodox, a sacrifice I've never made myself.

    Rebuke accepted 100%. Thank you Father.

    This is a good blog, I visit it often. It wasn't fair of me to bring this onto a blog that so many other people benefit from as well. I apologize to everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And I appreciate your visiting. The discussion of appropriate dress has been a contentious one and I think will continue to be as Orthodoxy gets its bearings in the New World.

    ReplyDelete