Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
This is absolutely absurd. I've never heard of this book but I will pray for the people who may have been misguided by its content. Thank you for posting this.
ReplyDeleteThe idea is to get footholds into groups that have traditionally been in opposition and slowly open a crack wider and wider until no one notices there was ever a wall up in the first place.
ReplyDeleteAs a society we trend towards more "freedom." As a result we grow more permissive about behavior we once deemed offensive in the name of equality and at the expense of heretofore mutually held values.