Sunday, July 4, 2010

On the Western Rite

From the blog Again and Again, a discussion of Western Rite Orthodoxy. I will say honestly that I have never received more strident messages from readers, than when I have commented on or covered the Western Rite movement. It is quite a charged topic and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future.



“Never, Never, Never let anyone tell you that in order to be Orthodox you must also be Eastern. The West was Orthodox for a thousand years, and her venerable liturgy is far older than any of her heresies.”

- St. John the Wonderworker

Today is the feast day of St. John of Shanghai and San Francisco and on the occasion of the feast day I thought I’d post this article from Orthodox England (here) entitled. :

THOUGHTS ON ‘WESTERN RITE’

Introduction

All religions have rites. Rites are necessary because we are incarnate. The bodiless angels do not need rites, but we do. In other words, the outward structures of rites are necessary in order to hold the spiritual content of religion, just as our bodies are necessary in order to hold our immortal souls. It can be said that a rite is a glass; the content is the wine. It is clear which is more important.

But which rite or rites should we use to contain this wine? Clearly, they must be worthy. In the Orthodox Church we have four very ancient eucharistic rites: those of St John Chrysostom, St Basil the Great, St James of Jerusalem (the most ancient of all) and the Presanctified Rite attributed to St Gregory the Dialogist. They all go back to the first century, but were not really settled until the fourth century and a few changes were made to them even after this. But beyond these, we have the rites associated with the many other services of the liturgical cycles of the year. Eucharistic rites are only part of the rites that we use. However important, the Eucharist is only part of Church life.

The question of a Western rite in Orthodoxy goes back generations and has a whole history in Western Europe, in North America and elsewhere. This question of a ‘Western rite’ seems to come up at regular intervals, every ten years or so, and well-rehearsed arguments are presented in favour of it. For the sake of those new to the Church, it would also be helpful to speak of the arguments against. These are not often expressed, all the more so when the arguments come from experience and observation of reality. What are these arguments...

Complete article here.

6 comments:

  1. As a Protestant becoming increasingly interested in Orthodoxy, I don't see the need for a Western Rite at all. A big reason for this is because Orthodox liturgy is in the vernacular. It's nice to be able to understand the words, but beyond that, I figured I would be experiencing something different.

    Also, I'm neither Catholic nor Anglican, so a rite based on the Latin Mass, Novus Ordo Mass, or the Book of Common Prayer wouldn't make me feel any more at home the the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I just wanted to point out this article is not by Father Milovan but by Father Andrew at ORTHODOX ENGLAND.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CJ: Some people see the "Western Rite" as a stepping stone towards 'being Eastern." I can say that we see a mirror here in the way the Eastern Catholics were treated by Rome before Vatican II. The idea was that the Roman Rite was normative and superior and that the Eastern Catholic Churches should mimic the Roman Church in theology and practice. That has since been abandoned as their position, but the stepping stone mentality exists in many places where the Western Rite is seen as training wheels for the Eastern Church.

    Matthew: Yes, it's in the intro after the quote. I thought about posting directly from the site he referenced, but decided his intro was helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Josephus: Sadly, I think that attitude still exists unofficially. There's a very popular blog by a Roman Catholic priest who is a great defender of the traditional Latin Mass. His and his readers' comments regarding married clergy, vernacular liturgy, and concelebration (multiple priests, not different communities) make me wonder what they think of their Byzantine Catholic brethren.

    ReplyDelete
  5. CJ: History has taught me the answer is that they don't think a lot about them. The Church to many of them is the Roman Church and anything separate from that is floating about rudderless apart from the Barque of Peter. Though, this is not a hard and fast rule - many Latin Mass churchgoers will attend Divine Liturgies at Byzantine Catholic parishes once or twice a year and enjoy it tremendously.

    ReplyDelete