Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Eastern Catholics ask for greater recognition, respect

These are not new requests. There is a long and often contentious history here. Respect for Eastern Catholic patriarchs, for particular (those of the sui iuris Churches) canon laws, for the married priesthood, and for equal treatment in Latin-dominated countries are all issues brought up over and over again. In many cases the response from Rome is that allowing Eastern Catholics to act as they do "at home" would be a scandal (σκάνδαλον, stumbling block) to the Latin faithful. The intent is to avert difficulties, but the message received is that the Latin Church is superior and normative while the Eastern Churches are being given leave to do only those things Rome permits. This sort of behavior must stop if they hope (as Rome has said) to show the Orthodox Church how union might look in a post-schism Church. Things like 'Ea Semper' and 'Cum Data Fuerit' still hold sway.


VATICAN CITY (CNEWA/CNS) — The vast majority of Catholics in the Middle East belong to Eastern Catholic churches, and their bishops spoke loudly at the Vatican, asking for greater respect and a higher profile for Eastern Catholics.

Reflecting the Catholic population of the region, 140 of the 185 voting members of the Synod of Bishops for the Middle East come from the Eastern Catholic churches, and several of them addressed the synod Oct. 12.

Not only did they ask for recognition of their rights, they also emphasized the work they need to do to strengthen the Christian identity of their faithful, preserve their heritage and end a sense of rivalry that can exist among Catholics of different rites.

Bishop Vartan Waldir Boghossian, the Argentina-based bishop for Armenian Catholics in Latin America, used rather strong language to get across points made by other Eastern Catholic bishops, particularly regarding limits placed on Catholic patriarchs when providing for their faithful who have emigrated from their traditional homelands.

The Eastern Catholic churches, while in full communion with the pope, have their own canon law and disciplines, their own liturgies, spiritualities, histories and heritage. While they tend to be identified with one country or geographical region, many of them now find that the majority of their faithful live abroad, Bishop Boghossian said.

And, he said, “of the 23 churches in their own right that make up the Catholic Church, only one — the Latin church — is not subject to this limitation” of the authority and power of the patriarch and synod being confined to the churches’ ancient geographical borders.

For example, while the bishops of the Armenian Catholic Church elect bishops for dioceses in Armenia, it is the pope who selects Armenian bishops for dioceses in the United States or Australia.

The Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches described the patriarchs as “fathers and leaders of their churches,” Bishop Boghossian said. “This paternity and jurisdiction must not be limited to a territory,” especially when the majority of the church’s members live outside that territory.

In addition, he said, the patriarchs of the Eastern Catholic churches, “because of their identity as fathers and leaders of the ‘sui iuris’ (self-governing) churches that make up the catholicism of the Catholic Church, ipso facto should be members of the college that elects the pontiff without the need for the Latin title of cardinal. For the same reason, they should also take precedence over them,” he said.

Currently, three of the Eastern Catholic patriarchs are cardinals; in the Vatican’s list of precedence, they come after the handful of cardinal-bishops and before the cardinal-priests and cardinal-deacons.

Coptic Bishop Antonios Aziz Mina of Guizeh, Egypt, said that especially when there are more faithful of an Eastern church living outside than inside the church’s territory, “it is not entirely logical that some faithful who belong to a ‘sui iuris’ church have no relationship with the church they belong to, other than liturgically."

“My request is that the patriarch be granted personal jurisdiction over the faithful of his church wherever they might be,” he said. This would be a huge change.

The Coptic bishop also asked Pope Benedict XVI to revoke a decision made in the 1930s that Eastern churches can ordain married men only in their traditional homelands. This would be even more monumental.

Msgr. Robert L. Stern, general secretary of the Catholic Near East Welfare Association, told the synod that by emphasizing the geographical limitation of an Eastern Catholic patriarch’s authority, the church was, in effect, working counter to a vision of the church as a network where unity does not mean uniformity and where communion grows through communication and sharing.

“In the model of network, many churches in the same territory is normal, and rivalries and attempts to proselytize or dominate are inappropriate,” he said.

Latin-rite Archbishop Jean Sleiman of Baghdad, Iraq, told the synod that for the survival of the Catholic Church in the Middle East, “a rigid or exaggerated” emphasis on belonging to one ritual church family must give way to cooperation and coordination of pastoral activities.

“Communion is especially contradicted by confessionalism. Rites are transformed into confessions,” he said.

4 comments:

  1. I find it odd and interesting that the Eastern Catholics are essentially asking for a situation like that which the Orthodox in the so-called diaspora are seeking a solution for. That is, the Eastern Catholics went a phyletistic structure, they do not want 'one city, one bishop'. The EAs are an attempt - whether successful or not is yet to be seen - to address these canonical anomalies; the Eastern Catholics are seeking to enshrine these canonical anomalies within the Roman communion.

    That being said, it is difficult to structure a system whereby a local bishop is bishop of all local Christians (in communion with that church) when that local community is made up of many local churches with their own traditions, canonical norms and rites.

    An interesting solution would be to place all Latin communities in Eastern Rite lands under local, Eastern Rite bishops. This would at least balance out the treatment of the various 'churches' within the Roman communion and give some experience to both sides a measure of the difficulties involved in pastoring 'foreign' rite faithful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember a Bishop involved in the ecumenical dialogues saying that the Eastern Rite Catholics regard themselves as the bridge between East and West but the East and West both regard them as "bastard children". sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is hardly a suprise when popes have openly declared in church documents that the Latin rite is superior to all others.

    The fact is that the Latin Rite bishops do not wish to lose their parishoners to eastern rites so they make it more dificult.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Acolyte4236: Certainly true even today and visible in a number of ways. I've known Byzantine Catholics who have baptized their child in a Latin church, but numerous Latin Catholics that go to Byzantine parishes that can't have their kids baptized there. Transfers of ritual church are dragged out or denied. Etc. Etc.

    ReplyDelete