Friday, December 17, 2010

'The Origins of Advent' by Fr. Patrick Henry Reardon


(orthodoxytoday.org) - In the Roman Catholic Church and other Christian churches of the West, the several weeks prior to Christmas are known as Advent, a name from a Latin word meaning "coming." It happens that the beginning of Advent always falls on the Sunday closest to November 30, the ancient feast day (in both East and West) of the Apostle Andrew. Among Christians in the West, this preparatory season, which tends to be slightly less rigorous than Lent and often involves no special fasting at all, always begins on the fourth Sunday before Christmas. Thus, from year to year it will vary in length between 3 and 4 weeks, but always with four Sundays. It is worth noting that many of the Eastern Catholic Churches in the US have severely curtailed their involvement in the Nativity Fast. The Ruthenian Church in particular has almost completed removed observance of it, only leaving an optional day of fasting on Fridays. There is some thought of returning to the original observance as can be seen by recent editorials in eparchial newsletters.

The observance of the season of Advent is fairly late. One finds no sermons for Advent, for instance, among the liturgical homilies of St. Leo the Great in the mid-fifth century. About that time, however, the season was already was already emerging in Spain and Gaul. A thousand years later, the time of the Reformation, Advent was preserved among the liturgical customs of the Anglicans and Lutherans; in more recent years, other Protestant groups have informally begun to restore it, pretty much as it had originally started--one congregation at a time.

In the Eastern Orthodox Church, the corresponding penitential season of preparation for Christmas always begins on November 15, the day after the Feast of the Apostle Philip. For this reason it is popularly known as St. Philip's Fast. A simple count of the days between November 15 and December 25 shows that this special period lasts exactly 40 days, the same as Lent.

More recently Christians of the Orthodox Church have begun to call this season by its Latin name, "Advent." One now finds the term standard in publications of the Antiochian Archdiocese, for instance. The adoption of the word "Advent" by Eastern Orthodox Christians is inspired by the same reason that prompted the adoption of other Latin theological terms, such "Sacraments," "Incarnation," and "Trinity." Very simply, these are the recognizable theological terms that have passed into Western languages. They also happen to be theologically accurate! If the Christian West can adopt Greek terms like "Christology," it seems only fair for the Christian East to adopt Latin terms like "Incarnation."

(On the other hand, one finds some Orthodox Christians, especially among recent, hyperactive converts from Western churches, who resist the adoption of the word "Advent," preferring to speak of "Winter Lent" or some such anomaly. One is hard pressed to explain this eccentric, lamentable preference for Anglo-Saxon over Latin on a point of theology.)

Several other features of Advent deserve some comment:
  • First, in the West the First Sunday of Advent is treated as the beginning of the liturgical year. (In the East, the liturgical year does not begin with Advent but on September 1, which bears the traditional title, "Crown of the Year." Its historical relationship to the Jewish feast of Rosh Hashana is obvious.)
  • Second, during the twentieth century there arose the lovely custom of the Advent wreath, both in church buildings and in homes. This wreath lies horizontal and is adorned with four candles. The latter, symbolic of the four millennia covered in Old Testament history, are lit, one at a time, on each Saturday evening preceding the four Sundays of Advent, by way of marking the stages in the season until Christmas. This modern practice has already started in some Orthodox Christian homes, where the longer season requires six candles on the Advent wreath.
  • Third, because of its emphasis on repentance, Advent is a season of great seriousness, not a time proper for festivity, much less of partying and secular concerns. Advent is not part of the Christmas holidays, and Christians of earlier times would be shocked at the current habit of treating this as a period of jolly good times and "Christmas cheer," complete with office parties, the trimming of Christmas trees and other domestic adornments, the exchange of gifts, caroling, and even the singing of Christmas music in church.
All of these festive things are part of the celebration of Christmas itself, which lasts the 12 days from December 25 to January 6. The seasons of the liturgical year involve more than liturgical services. The liturgical seasons is supposed to govern the lives of those who observe them. For this reason, anticipating these properly Christmas activities during Advent considerably lessens the chance of our being properly prepared, by repentance, for the grace of that greater season; it also heightens the likelihood that we will fall prey to the worldly spirit that the commercial world would encourage during this time.

10 comments:

  1. I had no idea that the advent wreath was relatively new, much less that it was originally a protestant custom. Thanks for posting this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Glad you liked it. I thought it a very solid article.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also didn't know that, Ryan.
    Thank you, Josephus. I agree, very solid and interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What is "worth noting" in your comments about the Philipovka in the Ruthenian church? Father Reardon already stipulates that, presumably within Orthodoxy, the Nativity Fast "often involves no special fasting at all".

    I also wonder the degree to which the emphasis (or perhaps re-emphasis) on ascetic practice in the Nativity fast a relatively recent occurrence for American Orthodoxy? It apparently is for ACROD (see Father Berringer's remarks at this link:
    http://www.acrod.org/readingroom/spirituallife/nativityfast). What was the Philpovka like among the Syrian Orthodox 40 years ago?

    Frs. Reardon and Berringer seem to have rather different takes on the spirit of the season. I wonder where Fr Reardon gets his sense of how Christians of earlier times would feel? And by earlier times: does he mean the Patristic era or just recent earlier times after the sack of Constantinople.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Worth noting for the sake of a more comprehensive summary. Often it's a Roman vs. Orthodox setting to articles and I like to throw in a bit on the Eastern Catholics as many readers of this blog either are Greek Catholic or might have some interest in their practices.

    Speaking only from my experience and the practices of parishes near me, fasting in this season ranges from almost Lenten to no observance at all.

    Fr. Lawrence Barriger's depiction of this fast as one of "joyful expectation" is interesting in that it is the exact same term Fr. Hopko uses for Great Lent. As a reader of both clergymen's books I'm happy to acknowledge the consensus on rejecting the secular, mercantile emphasis placed on Christmas these days and to simply defer to the wishes of my parish priest who advises a rather strict fast for the period. That said, my previous pastor took the view that the monasto-centric fasting practices of contemporary Orthodoxy were just that and advised those that wished to to go ahead and do the "full" fast if they so wished, but didn't mandate it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The whole notion of anything mandated seems quite odd and archaic to me. Isn't our faith voluntary?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks for this article. Re St. Leo the Great: Although he has no specifically 'Advent' homilies, he does have homilies for the December Fast (somewhat congruent to this past week's Ember Days) which are linked to the Incarnation -- thus, although Advent itself may not yet have taken root in Rome despite its growth in Spain and Gaul, we can see the foundations for its coming already laid in St. Leo's time.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't think I'ver ever thought of it that way. :) Christ certainly mandated quite a bit and our works need to match that faith. As St. Maximus says, "Theology without action is the theology of demons." - faith must be put into action and much of that action is askesis. Certainly key to monasticism is the idea of obedience (you can't get through any book on the topic without it on almost every other page), but I think this translates into the pastoral spiritual father - son relationship without too much nuance. He isn't directing if I'm not following.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Worth noting for the sake of a more comprehensive summary."

    Fair enough, but perhaps in the wrong spot. The history in the west - a centuries earlier origin and an eventual emphasis on liturgical expressions of the season rather than fasting - is very different that in the East - where there is almost no liturgical expression. I am still wondering about the tradition of fasting in the East, which apparently derived from monastic practices upon the collapse of the Cathedral rite.

    I would agree with the problem of secularization, but I think that buying gifts, decorating, and, as Fr. Berringer notes, singing of carols, all seem part of a joyful anticipation even in the context of serious preparation. I don't think that Philipovka is really a "winter lent": the church has not taught this idea through its liturgy.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Possibly. I comment as the mood strikes me.

    As to the Lenten nature. It's worth a solid scholarly treatment by some learned gentleman. I'd certainly read it. Post-cathedral changes are always quite intriguing. I myself find fasting, prayer, almsgiving, and a reduction in tv/movies to be a good way for me to put my mind more firmly on the upcoming feast. I don't necessarily see this as a dour or penitential way of approaching it as a I see it a carving out of fripperies so that the space can be filled with more worthwhile thoughts and an openness to His designs.

    ReplyDelete