Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I think that the relatively mild response to this outrage compared to the response to the picture of Mohammed a couple of years ago says much about our faith. Our religion is not about honor or worldly esteem. On the contrary, our Savior's entire ministry was a humble self-abasement. There is no ridicule, no degradation, that this world can hurl at our Lord that He has not already faced -- and conquered. Rather than facing this sort of offense with violence or retaliation, we embrace the Cross along with our Lord. "Thou wast beaten on the shoulders, yet I shun Thee not. Thou wast nailed to the Cross, and I do not conceal it. I boast in Thine arising, for Thy death is my life. O Lord Who lovest mankind, glory to Thee!"
ReplyDelete