Photo H/T: Vladimir Grygorenko
These topics included some issues related to Bishop Mark (administrator of the diocese and hopeful for the open episcopal spot): removal of the blessing of a priest from serving at the cathedral, the perceived changes in the way services are done at the cathedral, the forwarding of emails from Fr. Joseph Fester's email account to the Holy Synod and/or Mark Stokoe of OCANews, if he could be release from his duties or told to perform them somewhere else. Also, there were numerous concerns about the position Met. Jonah is in: his ability to travel, his treatment by the Synod, etc. Questions were also raised about the diocese itself: its future geographic makeup, episcopal candidates, etc.
All in all, I'm told it was - not surprisingly - quite an emotional affair.
Were there any answers to those questions raised?
ReplyDeleteThe primary response was that His Grace would send a letter to the synod and then things would go from there. So not much was answered, but that the priest was reinstated for now.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI doubt +Mark is much of a contender for the DOS episcopal slot anymore.
ReplyDeleteWere you there?
ReplyDeleteI'm heartened to hear this happened. I hope some good will come of it. I'm sure it must be a discouraging time for my brothers and sisters in the DOS.
ReplyDeleteWho is the man standing up front?
ReplyDeleteI attended this meeting and it was like a lynch mob. Personally, I could live with Bishop Mark ruling the Diocese of the South....by moving myself to another diocese. But I had hoped the much needed evisceration would be gentler. Let us grieve for Bishop Mark. His totalitarian style will prevent him ever keeping a diocese.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting to me that whenever +PHILIP axed someone the internet kneejerk was to lynch +PHILIP. Then it turns out the people he axed were indeed problems (the priest who was allegedly moved for "wearing a cassock" ended up in a non-canonical old calendarist cultic group IIRC). But there's usually very little follow up on this kind of thing until the next jurisdiction that snatched up the "treasure" finds out that someone else's "chaff" was cast off for a reason.
ReplyDeleteYes I noticed the same thing. Perhaps people should not listen to the orthodox enquirer/ocanews.org anymore or at least put it in the category of shameful gossip where it belongs.
ReplyDelete