Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I haven't watched the whole thing (so I could be wrong), but I suspect that what you're identifying as Greek is really just liturgical Coptic, which includes a significant amount of Greek (indeed, even the Coptic alphabet is almost entirely based on the Greek alphabet).
ReplyDeleteI remember the first time I picked up a Coptic liturgy book at one of their churches how surprised I was at how much I could make out, based on my (meager) knowledge of Greek.
There's a lot of kyrie eleison, Agios o Theos, etc. in there.
ReplyDeleteYep -- liturgical Coptic (e.g., see p. 55).
ReplyDeleteIt's actually Coptic, I've asked the same questions.
ReplyDelete