Sr. Vassa: There's no ontological impediment to priestesses
Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I am afraid that the Roman Catholic Archbishop is misinformed. Alligators are not fish, Alligators are reptiles Besides they have a backbone, which means that they are not lenten food, even on those days like the Annunciation and Palm Sunday when we can eat fish. When I was assigned to Shreveport, I asked Bishop Basil about it and he told me that alligators could not be considered lenten food.
ReplyDeleteFr. John W. Morris
The Catholic traditions in the then missionary territories of the Americas tended to call things that spent most the time in the water as "fish" whether that is biologically correct or not. South of Detroit locally Catholics are permitted muskrat as lenten food. In New Orleans apparently Alligator is by tradition also considered a "fish." In parts of South America Capybaras, a water-borne rodent, is considered fish and appropriate for Lent. Local quirkiness that has stuck around until modern times is all it adds up to. These locals with special dispensations are still abstaining form certain foods as a penance, that is what really matters.
ReplyDeleteFR. Morris,
ReplyDeleteFish have backbones, so that cannot be a point of distinction between fish and alligators.
You might want to recall that the rules about what is meat (which is to be avoided for abstinence) were established long before modern understandings of family connections among animalia, and that the traditional understanding was that meat was from warm-blooded animals only. That would put reptiles in the "not-meat" category which includes, but is not limited to, fish.
When one strict fasts, one does not eat anything with a back bone. That is why we can eat shrimp, mussels or even lobster even during a strict fast. An historical note. Although today we consider lobster a luxury food. That was not always the case. Not that long ago lobster was food for the peasants and servants, not the elite.
DeleteInteresting letter..knew some how about the alligator.plastic business cards
ReplyDelete