Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I read over the link theguide42 kindly provided (dont have time to listen to podcast), and as a Catholic I have to say I reject majority of Fr Hopko's requirements, obviously seems the only way "reconciliation" will ever happen will be through outright conversion of one faction to the other.
ReplyDeleteThough I suggest he forward his ideas on the reform of papal elections and papal appointments to the Church of Russia since a lot of it is applicable to the Patriarch of Moscow as well.