Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I suppose there would be less Russophobia in Russia stopped attacking its neighbours
ReplyDeleteSpecifically in Church terms, the Moscow Patriarchate has managed to upset a lot of its Orthodox brothers and sisters in Western Europe by its aggressive taking over of churches like those in Nice and London (and its failed attempt in Biarritz). Patriarch Kirill and Metropolitan Hilarion Alfeyev should not be surprised if their complaints of "Russophobia" and "discrimination against adherents of the Moscow Patriarchate" fail to elicit any sympathy.
ReplyDelete