Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
1. The hand that is coming out of the buildings holding the basketball, does it represent the Lakers or Clippers?
ReplyDelete2. Since there is a basketball, why are no other LA sports represented?
3. Is the Theotokos standing on heavenly clouds or smog?
4. Since all the hierarchs in the West are represented, does the icon need to be redone if:
a. one or more of them reposes?
b. one or more are transferred to a different diocese?
c. one or more retires?
d. Orthodox unity in America actually happens and there ends up being only one bishop in LA?