Melkites welcome Russian involvement in Syria

(Catholic Herald) - One of Syria’s leading churchmen has welcomed Russia’s intervention.

Melkite Greek Catholic Archbishop Jean-Clément Jeanbart of Aleppo told Swiss television that Vladimir Putin’s intervention was a source of “hope” for the country’s Christians.

The Russian president, Archbishop Jeanbart told Télévision Suisse Romande, “serves the Christians’ cause”, even if Moscow was only serving its own interests.

Archbishop Jeanbart spoke of a “renewal of confidence” among Christians in Syria, adding that President Putin “is solving a problem”.

Russia escalated its military involvement late last month, launching attacks on Syrian rebels in Homs, and against ISIS in the formerly heavily Christian village of Al-Qaryatayn, which the terrorist group overran in the summer.

ISIS, which controls the east of the country, has carried out numerous atrocities against Christians and other minorities. However, the al-Assad regime has been blamed for the majority of the 200,000 deaths since the conflict began in 2011.

Comments

  1. Ecclesial VigilanteOctober 12, 2015 at 11:13 AM

    It's a strange world we live in. I absolutely despise what Russia has done in the Ukraine, though I admire the effectiveness with which it was executed.

    With Syria, I am glad Putin has decided to annihilate the terrorists "moderate" or otherwise and leave Obama whimpering that "I am totally in control, guys!". Someone needs to take out the savages of Daesh and Putin is the only one with the spine to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Steve_BarrieOctober 13, 2015 at 9:27 AM

    It is a confusing situation as to what the end will be for Putin's involvement in Syria:
    Read this article:SYRIAN CHRISTIANS OUTRAGED BY STATEMENTS OF RUSSIAN CHURCH ABOUT "HOLY WAR"

    RISU, 7 October 2015



    Christians living in Syria have responded very negatively to recent statements of an official representative of the Russian Orthodox church, in which he called the air strikes delivered by Russian warplanes a part of a sacred struggle. This is being reported by BBC.



    The report recalls that the head of the synod's Department for Relations of Church and Society of the Moscow patriarchate, Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, stated: "The struggle with terrorism and for a just peace and the dignity of people who are experiencing the challenge of terror is very moral and is, if you will, a holy struggle, and today our country is, probably, the most active force in the world that is opposing terror."



    The priest also emphasized that Russia has always played "a special role" in the Middle East.



    In response to this statement, one of the leaders of the Syrian Christian church, Bishop Ilias Tuma, stated: "There cannot be any kind of holy war in Christianity! Regardless of whether someone agrees with this or not."



    Yet another Syrian priest, Ispiridon Tanus, stated in an interview with the website Suriyat, which sympathizes with the opposition, that Russia is playing with fire: "Martyrs in our church will not become martyrs of war; they are victims of war."



    At the same time, an announcer of the pan-Arab sattelite television channel Al-Jazera, Feisal al-Kasim, wrote on his Twitter page: "When the Russian church describes the Russian intervention in Syria as a holy war, it thereby unwittingly calls Muslims to jihad."



    Many Christian commentators on social networks also have expressed anger over the words of the press secretary of the RPTs. "The unchristian and unethical statements of the Russian church do not reflect either the views of Christians of the East or of Christianity in general. Let's recall that the idea of 'holy war' came from the western crusaders," Nadzhib Georg Avad wrote on Facebook.



    "We Christians of the Middle East believe in holy peace and coexistance," he added. (tr. by PDS, posted 9 October 2015)
    http://www2.stetson.edu/~psteeves/relnews/151007d.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nicholas SandoukasOctober 15, 2015 at 5:14 AM

    I guess what Israel did to the Canaanites doesn't count.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ofgraceOctober 18, 2015 at 2:46 PM

      Do you know of any Father of the Orthodox Church who considered Israel's exploits in the OT a template for Christian action in the world or who interpreted and applied those historical passages in this way? Were they not, rather, considered "shadows" and "types," the spiritual meaning and application of which is revealed and fulfilled in Christ's conquest of Hell? Your comment here seems to reflect a mindset akin to Puritan theodicy, but is foreign to Orthodox Tradition. Perhaps it was meant tongue in cheek?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Response to “On administering Holy Communion in a Time of a Plague”

This was sent to me and deserves a read. You can read the Calivas article here . We can all agree that we are living in unusual times. However, the nature and extent of the illness that we face, and the proper response of the Church, is a matter of much disagreement. We have seen various responses to the COVID-19 epidemic: calls to close our Churches as infectious vectors, and demands to open them as places of spiritual healing. Directives a) ordering the cessation of sacramental life as part of an effort to “flatten the curve,” and cries for access to the divine grace that flows forth from those very mysteries; b) calling for the restriction of “at-risk persons,” and serious questions about the validity of such controls, c) instructions to liturgists to wear personal protective equipment during the celebration of the divine services and the distribution of the holy Mysteries, and uncertainty about the fitness of such practices. Who has been championing what and on behalf of whom? The ...
Read more

Sr. Vassa: There's no ontological impediment to priestesses

Image
Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Read more