Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I find it curious that the enthronement was done entirely in Arabic. The Antiochian presence in the UK includes a lot of refugees from the Anglican descent into apostasy -- I'm in the UK on sabbatical and worship with the Antiochian Orthodox community in York when I visit my daughter, who lives there, services entirely in English except for the Our Father being prayed in as many languages as are the native-tongue or preferred language of prayer among those present (last time English, Greek, Arabic, Slavonic and Arabic), with the core of the community being entirely converts from Anglicanism. I'd be surprised if cradle Orthodox from the Levant outnumber English converts among the Antiochian communities in England.
ReplyDelete