Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Orthodox Christian Laity continues to push hard for Crete

(OCL) - One year ago, the worldwide Christian Community was looking East to Chania, Crete to see what would result from the gathering of Orthodox Bishops called together by Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew to meet as a Holy and Great Council. The preparations for the meeting were 60 years in the making. In 2008, the 14 Patriarchs and self-governing heads of the Churches of the old Roman Empire, the traditional Orthodox lands, agreed to meet and began discussions to settle on an agenda. Within this 8-year time frame, 6 agenda items were agreed upon. The meeting was on track until four months before the June 2016 date when four Church leaders broke the 8-year agreement to meet. Antioch, Russia, Bulgaria and Georgia, for various reasons, declined to attend.

To the great credit of Patriarch Bartholomew and the other bishops, the Holy and Great Council took place, and there were some positive results. Without the four obstructionist Churches attending, Orthodoxy showed that it could be a conciliar Church after all. The fact that the Holy and Great Council took place, and that the bishops attending signed the protocols and agreed that they need to meet more regularly, are hopeful signs. It is now up to the body of the Church to reinforce, discuss and accept the work of the Council, so that it can truly be a Holy and Great Council. It becomes a Holy and Great Council when the body of the Church affirms the work of the bishops. It really does not matter who attended and who did not.

But to affirm the work, we need to know what was decided. The Patriarchate issued detailed and official documents outlining what was discussed and agreed upon, and the names of the bishops are affixed to the document. Reading and digesting these documents is the first step in growing in understanding of the results of the meeting. They are a primary source. The Encyclical, Message and the other Official Documents of the Holy and Great Council are available at: https://www.holycouncil.org/.

Another excellent source is the Diary of the Council by Bishop Maxim of the Western American Diocese – Serbian Orthodox Church. This is another primary source. Every evening after the meetings, he kept a diary, which is also a personal reflection of daily proceedings and events. Bishop Maxim writes: “What the significance is and what the consequences are of this Council – the post conciliar period will show, since the process of the reception of the Council and its decisions may take time, depending on the vitality of the ecclesiastical body, and the work of the local bishops, among the people….This reception (giving and receiving) of the Council depends primarily on the work of the local bishops among their flocks.”

What about the Council has your local bishop discussed with you? Is your Diocese or Metropolis or Archdiocese moving “beyond words to actions…. Moving beyond what is mine and yours, to what is ours.” It is up to you to ask, act and decide to participate across jurisdictional lines locally. You need to get the bishops involved. Locally, parish by parish, we need to interconnect and find those in our communities who have skill sets and invite them to participate across jurisdictional lines to address the needs of your local Orthodox Christian Community. In the parish community, inter-jurisdictional programs for seniors, youth, religious education, counseling, outreach, mission, etc. will better meet the needs of the faithful. The best-qualified person in one parish can service all those with similar needs across jurisdictional lines. Parish by parish, we need to work together to be Orthodox Christians. Our young adults in college do this by reaching out to each other across jurisdictional lines to remain Orthodox on our college campuses.

Orthodox Christian Laity will continue to keep the vison of Unity alive. We have been doing this for 30 years. We invite you to watch the three video programs that we presented and recorded this year to help you know and understand what the Holy and Great Council was about. The videos are posted on OCL’s YouTube page. Two of them are presentations by two individuals who participated in the work of the Holy and Great Council. They were there. They are lay persons. The comments and impressions they present are primary sources. They are our eyes and ears into the work of the Council. Dr. Gayle Woloschak was part of the team that organized and implemented and facilitated the work secretariat for the bishops, press and observers attending the meeting. Dr. Elizabeth Prodromou was one of three women who attended the meeting in an official capacity appointed by Patriarch Bartholomew. Dr. Helen Theodoropoulos presents a picture of what we can do locally to be a unified church across jurisdictional barriers. Make plans to attend the OCL annual Meeting in Chicago on October 28, 2017.

Unity will come about because of the actions, desires and work of the laity. We must insist on a conciliar Church. This is the Orthodox administrative ethos. The Assembly of Bishops cannot agree on how to discuss unity. There is no way to include minority reports in their discussions. They proceed only when there is one hundred percent unanimity. Some Committees do not meet. Proceedings are not published. Bishops are now bogged down in ethnicity and old world politics. In some places, they refuse to serve together. Where is the accountability and transparency in their meetings? Where is the hierarchical leadership? The leadership void must be filled by the laity who know and understand and support the work of the Holy and Great Council. The laity must educate itself and not let the work that was begun last year dissipate because of the lack of local hierarchical leadership and vison.

7 comments:

  1. It is sad that even OCL continues to misremisrepresent the situation of the non-participating churches. The Church of Antioch was very clear for a long time that the changes to the ground rules for council were not acceptable. Their withdrawal from the council was not a last-minute decision but was clearly communicated to the Ecumenical Patriarch and the other patriarchs long before the date of the meeting. The dishonesty surrounding the Crete meeting is disheartening and only works against unity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is sad that even OCL continues to misremisrepresent the situation of the non-participating churches. The Church of Antioch was very clear for a long time that the changes to the ground rules for council were not acceptable. Their withdrawal from the council was not a last-minute decision but was clearly communicated to the Ecumenical Patriarch and the other patriarchs long before the date of the meeting. The dishonesty surrounding the Crete meeting is disheartening and only works against unity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The problem was no one cared about Antioch. They still don't. They didn't care when Antioch asked for help. They didn't when Antioch voiced concerns with the council. Nobody cared and Antioch, thankfully, put on their big boy britches and said enough. And, thankfully, Russia at least backed us which really brought attention. I'm glad Antioch didn't participate. I'm glad we've thrown off the EP yoke.

      Delete
  3. "Except for the Churches that didn't participate, all of them participated." Calling them obstructionist. That's a good move. That'll be sure to get them on board. I'm glad people stood up to the EP if they felt something was off. If I wanted a supreme pontiff, I'd look at Catholicism. If something is wrong, I want them to challenge each other.

    ReplyDelete
  4. that stench in the air is called desperation...

    ReplyDelete
  5. "One year ago, the worldwide Christian Community was looking East to Chania"

    This shows how biased they are: Russia, Ukraine, the Antiochian and Jerusalem Patriarchates were all looking WEST (or southwest) at Crete.

    That is to say, the majority of Orthodox Christianity was not looking in the same direction as OCL. How telling!

    ReplyDelete