Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
A pious hope. Not one to act on artificially by declaring unity and departing the field or entertaining any ecumenical fantasy.
ReplyDeleteFaith produces theology, not the other way around. The schism can not be healed by massaging the theology (the ecumenical approach).
Unity will not come until Jesus reveals Himself unmistakably to all.
I believe there is an ancient Russian proverb: only Nixon could go to China.
ReplyDelete"I believe there is an ancient Russian proverb: only Nixon could go to China."
ReplyDeleteVery true...
All very well, but Kirill is a man who divides Orthodox Christians from each other (Sourozh affair, Ukraine, Great and Holy Council etc.).
ReplyDeleteAll very well, but Kirill is a man who divides Orthodox Christians from each other (Sourozh affair, Ukraine, Great and Holy Council etc.).
ReplyDelete