Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
http://orthochristian.com/108827.html
ReplyDeleteThis was such an epic bummer. I finest started gutting messages from friends around midnight — disbelief combined withal desire for it to be true, people wondering if relations between Russia and Ukraine would begin improving now.
ReplyDeleteBut by the time I woke up this morning the Russian press was full of more sober analysis, and then came the statement from Metropolitan Hilarion that the "story" was all the fault of a reckless journalist at Interfax whose statements made it seem like Philaret was repenting.
Philaret is in deep prelest it seems, and his behavior is getting more and more bizarre. Something still smells fishy in all of this...
One last comment before bed:
ReplyDeleteFor a "patriarch" he doesn't even try to sound patristic.
"Why is that? Because we have our own state."