Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Julian is still more accurate
ReplyDeleteBut it’s not to avoid variability. It’s to avoid dependence upon Jewish authorities.
ReplyDeleteThe underlying calculation for Pascha is based upon the underlying calculation for Passover.
"Julian is still more accurate"
ReplyDelete?????
And the earth is flat....
Delete....if you believe the Gregorian is more accurate. Funny thing about the Julian, it's still used for astronomical measurements. The Gregorian is broken and dates that you see are translated. Then there is the 28year cycle in the Julian that is lost in the Gregorian. No, the Julian is a better calendar.
Delete