Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
so what this mean?????? It received and will consider? so what? I received a bill from my electric company today which i will consider - so what?
ReplyDeletewe get so tied up in byzantine red tape --- and end up saying nothing ---- i just do not understand the sanity of the whole process -- there is a canonical church in the country - now there are two major splits -- all due to secular politics -- it just boggles the mind -- can't we play nicely in the sand box?
all is see is egos, egos, egos