Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I don't trust the words that come out of "Epiphaniy" Sergey Dumenko's mouth. The fact that he said this publicly should be taken as indicating the opposite, which has been reported on other Ukrainian sites and now translated on orthochristian.com
ReplyDeletehttp://orthochristian.com/119744.html
This priest is not only refusing to go under the Ecumenical Patriarchate, he even continues to refer to Mikhail Denisenko as "his holiness Patriarch Philaret," which is a title Philaret himself said he would only use in Ukraine (not when abroad).
ReplyDeletehttps://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=660066274448735&set=a.156253661496668&type=3
I've said this before; if Patriarch Bartholomew wanted to be taken seriously, he should have insisted Filaret be considered a layman or at most, a defrocked monk.
ReplyDeleteFurthermore, I believe the two Ukrainian Hierarchs from the US entered into this deal to stop Filaret from grabbing any more parishes here. About 4 or 5 of their churches have switched to Filaret. Per their 2017 Calendar, those parishes are under canonical sanction.
ReplyDelete