Sr. Vassa: There's no ontological impediment to priestesses
Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Lord, have mercy.
ReplyDeleteThis is such an obvious propaganda piece. Lord have mercy on the suffering Ukrainians who are being used as a political bargaining chip.
ReplyDeleteThis is tragic; and voting regarding church affiliation based on secular government loyalties is a fundamental misunderstanding (and betrayal) of the Orthodox Faith. Patriarch Bartholomew will have much to answer for, given that he did not, and does not, have the authority to take churches, people, or property from the jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Moscow. He is responsible for introducing a schism. How can anyone possibly justify such a thing?
ReplyDeleteAs for the "recognition" of the Ukrainian schism by Secretary of State Pompeo, does anyone else believe that this is a craven act based on worldly politics, and is about as far from the Kingdom of Heaven as one can get? Lord, have mercy!
Sadly we’re witnessing a new Cold War, instigated by America, in which religious sabotage is being leveraged as much as financial and military options.
Delete