Thursday, June 6, 2019

Pope of Rome stirs pot on closed communion

Those pesky theologians! If I were Catholic, I'd be in a constant state of what-did-he-say-now readiness every morning when I got up to check my religious news feeds because this pontiff is frankly less predictable than my four-year-old son. It's statements like this that are at the root of why the idea of receiving the Catholic Church into Orthodoxy gives many slightly panicked looks. On the other hand, I don't see enough scholastic work in the world that would build the necessary momentum to convince the laity to be in favor of "Reunion now!" You will need the laity and the theologians of both sides to countenance such a move.


(RNS) — On the plane returning to Rome from Romania, Pope Francis made an extraordinary statement on the role of theology in ecumenical relations at his press conference Sunday (June 2).

In the past, church officials have stressed the need for theological agreement before Christian unity or Eucharistic sharing could be possible.

As a result, the Catholic Church is involved in extensive and complex theological dialogues with other Christian churches. These dialogues have made great progress in dealing with issues raised by the Reformation, but new issues (women’s ordination, gay marriage, abortion) have arisen that divide the churches.

This makes it very difficult to reach a final agreement.

But Francis told reporters on the plane, “Ecumenism is not getting to the end of discussions, it’s done walking together,” according to Crux. The journey is more important than the destination.

As a result, Francis stresses the ecumenism of shedding blood together and of working together in service to the poor, the sick and the marginalized. This fits with his famous statement that “facts are more important than ideas.” How we live our faith is more important than how we explain it.

But during the press conference Francis went further. As he explained on the plane, “there is already Christian unity,” according to the National Catholic Reporter. “Let’s not wait for the theologians to come to agreement on the Eucharist.”

Is the pope signaling his willingness to move toward Eucharistic sharing without total theological agreement?
This would be consistent with everything else he is saying. If it is the journey, not the destination, that is important, then why not share food during the trip? Why wait until we arrive?

Such a view would see the Eucharist as a unifying sacrament rather than a celebration of unity. It says, in effect, that any differences two groups might have aren't important and don't matter in the bigger picture - that neither side is solely in the right and neither side is wrong. 

Ironically, during his visit, theological divisions made it impossible for the pope even to pray the Lord’s Prayer with Romanian Orthodox Patriarch Daniel, as right-wing Orthodox objected to their praying together. As a result, the pope prayed it first in Latin, followed by the patriarch saying it in Romanian. Right wing? What silliness. Don't paint Orthodox teaching with political ideology.

But the pope revealed that from what he could see, most of the people at the service in the Orthodox cathedral prayed both times.

“The people went beyond us leaders,” explained Francis.

Likewise, in the Catholic Church, the people often lead the way and the theologians follow, not the other way around. My daughter's driver's education manual calls this "overdriving your headlights."

Bankers started charging interest on loans before theologians distinguished interest from usury. Scientists knew the Earth revolved around the sun before biblical scholars applied literary criticism to Genesis. American Catholics embraced religious freedom before the church caught up at Vatican II. And as a result everybody loves bankers, trusts scientists, and envies post-Vatican II church attendance? Right?

Today, Catholics are encouraging their Protestant spouses to join them at Communion. Divorced and remarried Catholics are returning to Communion. Gay couples approach Communion ministers together. Catholic couples are practicing contraception.

The laity have moved forward; they are not waiting for theologians or the hierarchy to lead them. They are waiting for them to catch up. Catch up? The road to hell is paved with such "good" intentions. I don't plan to wax the way with my silent consent to such.

9 comments:

  1. Father - I'm a Catholic reader of your blog. You nailed it when you wrote "if I were Catholic, I'd be in a constant state of what-did-he-say-now readiness every morning when I got up to check my religious news feeds . . ." If I gave you a dollar each time I opened my news feed, saw a picture of the current pope, and thought "Oh s***! What now?", you would be able to afford a nice steak dinner (including wine and dessert).

    ReplyDelete
  2. "If I were Catholic, I'd be in a constant state of what-did-he-say-now readiness every morning when I got up to check my religious news feeds."

    As an ordinary Catholic layman I can assure you that most of us understand that a pope's comments and press statements and speculations shouldn't be any cause for anxiety. On the whole I have no more problem with Francis than with Benedict; I rather like them both. As is always the case with popes (and people, for that matter), they have different backgrounds, different priorities, different ways of expressing themselves. But it's no wonder that the Orthodox balk at Catholicism when some Catholics seem whipsawed by every press report and ecclesiastical bruhaha. My job is to live the faith as best I can. I sometimes have an opinion, positive or negative, about what a pope says or does, but happily I haven't the authority to sit in judgment on him--nor would I want it. The papacy is an important office in the Church, but it certainly was never intended to be a matter of incessant hand-wringing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Today, Catholics are encouraging their Protestant spouses to join them at Communion. Divorced and remarried Catholics are returning to Communion. Gay couples approach Communion ministers together. Catholic couples are practicing contraception"

    This is the fruit of lay leadership that we're supposed to admire and the church is supposed to catch up with?

    Homosexuality, divorce, and contraception? Talk about embracing death and calling it progress.

    I know Francis isn't supported by many catholics, but if he keeps going like this or if the next pope is cut from the same cloth, its hard not to imagine a massive falling away or a full on schism in catholicism. Then again I know more "lapsed" catholics who hate the pope but dont do anything about it than I know practicing Catholics.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Father,

    Have you seen this? https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/holy-see-confirms-changes-to-italian-liturgical-translation-of-our-father-gloria-63355

    The translation of that part of the Gloria seems heretical even according to Latin Catholicism, but what is your judgment on this?

    ReplyDelete
  5. If I were Catholic, I'd be a Sedavacantist. Actually, we Orthodox are the original Sedavacantists.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gotta disagree with you there. The Pope and his following fell away from the Church. It has nothing to do with the legitimacy of a particular prepare. Claiming Orthodox are "original sedevancatists" is just wrong.

      Delete
    2. prelate not prepare. autocorrect is annoying

      Delete
  6. You totally misunderstood. Nowhere did I say the Orthodox Church WASNT the True Church. Rome did break away, hence the see of Rome is vacant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, Rome is not vacant but in schism and heresy.

      Delete