Tuesday, September 28, 2021

Church Growth and Decline in the COVID Crisis

This isn't a political discussion (have no fear), but rather a talk on what new struggles COVID has given us and what opportunities it has offered us.Also, longtime readers will know I am a big fan of Bishop Irenei of Great Britain and Western Europe, but I think this series transcends my bias.


23 comments:

  1. I'm a eyewitness to the growth of a Russian Patriarchal church in my town that never shut down or denied the Sacramental life to any Orthodox from any other jurisdiction in my town. What the bishop said is TRUE.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is clearly impossible as such a parish would not have anyone left alive in the midst of this deadly pandemic.

      Delete
  2. I don't think "fear" (phobos) has much to do with it, rather it is the second thing he points to "wordliness" and unbelief in the form of a habit of mind and heart usually called 'secularism'. "fear" is just an emotional data point, usually of something only partially understood but nevertheless that which has the ability to harm you, those you love, society, etc. I want my children to "fear" what a 2 ton car can do to their little bodies, so I want them to have the appropriate rational response, such as looking both ways when they cross the street or clicking their seatbelts when they get in the car.

    Deadly pandemics are rightly "feared", and in this I can't tell if the good bishop is joining with those who use the term in an immature, accusatory and taunting way. Christ certainly "feared" suffering and death (take this cup, why has thou forsaken me, etc.) and thus fear is not in of itself a sin, though as the good bishop points out Christianly hope and faith in the resurrection is what takes the sting out of death.

    In the end, his thoughts (and certainly Trenhem's) on "fear" and the effects of this pandemic in the Church certainly strongly correlate with the usual progressive vs traditionalist, greek vs russian polemics and this takes away from their voice in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not a "deadly" pandemic at all. Teach your children basic statistics.

      https://www.statista.com/statistics/1191568/reported-deaths-from-covid-by-age-us/

      If you think this pandemic is deadly then you and your family just need to stay home.

      Delete
  3. It's sad that the pandemic was highly likely man made.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fear is the greatest weapon of tyrannical authoritarianism. The sheeple played right into their hands. It is said many times in Scripture "Be not afraid." The Church must take a stand against Covidism!

    The pandemic is to force you to get the vaccine. The vaccine is to force you to get the vaccine passport. The vaccine passport is to force you to get the social credit score. The social credit score is to force you to obey the government. The government can then deny you food, housing, medicinal, travel, etc.

    Be watchful. Marxism is alive and well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Australia is like a Marxist fortress. America is terminating employees. Healthcare workers who were yesterday's heroes, are today's villains. Canada is not much better than Australia. I hope you are correct about some of the EU nations reversing course. But one thing you are terribly mistaken about Dave...inoculation is not the answer. One cannot even call them vaccines. Not only is there a horrific spiritual admonition (the link to abortive fetal tissue) but the mRNA shots have the potential to cause even more injury and death than they already have.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "mRNA has been around for awhile."

    It has never been very successful.

    "The fetal links were not an issue before COVID"

    Poppycock! Of course they were. They have always been an issue! Abortion is abortion!

    "goal posts keep shifting, going from "the vaccinated will be dead in two years" to "dangerous placebo with adverse effects" and now they are pivoting to the "freedom and abortion argument."

    I don't know about dead in two years, Dave. I suppose time will tell. I do know that these so-called vaccines are not blessed by God because of the abortion link...and none of your sugar-coating and justifications will change that. My argument (aside from the obvious abortion link) is that people should have a choice. If you want the mRNA jab...get it. If you don't want it, your livlihood should not be destroyed. That is tyranny.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "I didn't see any real push to boycott those products before COVID"

    That doesn't mean it is blessed by God.

    "But the "anti-vax" people are just as shrill in their condemnation of those who get "the jab"

    Neither side should denigrate the other. And by the way,the majority are not "anti-vax"...they are anti-mRNA.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Freedom of choice seems to be OK with abortion, but, "not OK" with with the vaccine. Umm!

    ReplyDelete
  9. "Our Church deliberated and has come to a sensible and balanced position, I think. You can disagree, of course. But again, where does this disagreement come from? I think that is also a question worth reflecting on."

    It's a great question worth reflecting on. Some Hierarchs within the Church have fluffed away the abortion question. They have jumped through hoops and used worldly justifications to give the green light. Other Hierarchs have stood firm and proclaimed that the properly formed conscience does not give such permission...it is the Law of God. In the end, if you are an advocate for the mRNA inoculation, you will side with the former. For me, when I stand before the Judgment Seat of Christ, this is one issue where I do not want to be on the short end.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did not say that myself or anyone else on this blog is like St. Mark. That would be prelest.

      Delete
    2. I just read an article about WEIRD culture by Rod Dreher. I’m woefully out of the loop on these things. It brought to mind the question though of if decisions to go along or go against certain people come from a place of WEIRD culture

      Delete
  10. Dear David B.,

    We might be small in number, but we’ve opposed the use of fetal tissue and cell lines in medicine and vaccines for nearly a decade (some folks longer). It’s not new and it’s not just because of the Covid vaccine. We realize this information is new to most people especially in the church.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "That is why I think we should listen to our Bishops on this one."


      "Do not show obedience to bishops who advise you to do and to say and to believe in things which are
      not to your benefit.” Saint Meletios of Antioch (†381)

      Delete
    2. Dear David,

      The Lord Bless you!
      I’m thankful for your reply and thoughts. I don’t wish to belabor this topic and related tangents. You’ve offered a nuanced and principled reflection, May God bare the fruit.

      I agree with you, St. Mark is a good example for many reasons and he isn’t a flag to be used. Although he was imprisoned for his lack of capitulation, then subsequently persecuted for that until his death.

      Delete
  11. In terms of a real “push”, we are basically powerless, so you will continue no real options or alternatives for us.

    But I will point out, in terms of lobby, it’s there. In fact, President Biden specifically undid a President Trump Era restriction of use of fetal tissue.

    Aside from letter writing, essay/article writing, resisting vaccine mandates on religious grounds, discussing with our hierarchy and asking their support and clear teaching, lobbying the federal government, and petitioning companies to produce ethical vaccines, and supporting companies who are working to produce ethical vaccines, I’m not sure what more you think we can do, but we are certainly open to new ideas!

    ReplyDelete
  12. "...I’m not sure what more you think we can do, but we are certainly open to new ideas!..."

    What I really like about your list Fr. Alexis is how it highlights a fundamental (Orthodox) Christian Integrationalism. In other words all its tools/methods (i.e. letter writing, lobbying, petitioning...) are the tools and limits delineated by Classical Liberalism and the society it produces - our society.

    Your not proposing anything more or less than an integrationalist response, such as producing, from the *Christian* ground up so to speak, a real Christian medical alternative structure to the medical industrial complex we all participate in - a serious of Orthodox pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, and doctors that would be separate and sustainable alternative system from the current one, and would be inline with our theological anthropology and its ethical implications.

    I agree with you in that "powerlessness" from a Christian ethic is the right word to describe the integrationalist response. Classical Liberalism has it's own ontology and ethic, one that explicitly "brackets off" all other anthropoligies (such as Christianity) for its own view of man and the relationship of practical to theoretical reason. Christians, if they are a majority, can make space for their ethic, but can never triumph. When out of the majority as we are now we are just a small and largely vain voice and we are rightly (as defined by CL) ignored on anything of import.

    Where I disagree with you is your take on vaccine mandates. As near as I can tell your trying to wield CL itself, in this case in the form of "freedom of conscience before God" that is built into it (and birthed in the Protestant Revolution) as a theological and ethical justification within an Orthodox context.

    This is a hypocrisy in that you, your family, your flock are all integrationalists and full participants in the medical industrial complex as it is. When (not if) you, a member of your family, or your flock have an emergent condition, when (not if) you have a chronic disease such as cancer, heart disease, etc. etc. who you gonna call? 911 of course and whole body of the current system. Thus, your objection to these specific vaccines and public health mandates are simplistic reasonings - your doing (ethical) arithmetic when the hiearchs of GOA and others are at least doing algebra because they at least account for the complexity that pandemics are not in fact "private" medical affairs, these cell lines and technologies are embedded in *most* of the medicine, etc. etc. In this you claim our are being ethically consistent with Orthodox beliefs, but in fact you are ignoring the consequences of your position to your brother (Orthodox or not). When push comes (and it will), you will lay aside your rigorous ethic and rush yourself or your loved ones to the medical industrial complex just as the integrationist hierarchs you criticize.

    This is all part of being limited to working and living *within* the CL system and trying to be Orthodox in an integrationalist way.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dear Jake,

    I read your response to me, full of disparaging comments, accusations, and false (inaccurate?) associations. It warrants no response.

    I realize you don’t know me or really anything about me. I am thankful for you demeaning me. God Bless you!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Bless Father Alexis,

    You can always count on Jake for a good dose of calumny.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Mikail,

      May the Lord Bless you and your family and keep us all! Thankful for your prayers!

      Delete
  15. Puuuleeeease Fr. Alexis, you just this morning (on the "greek-archdiocese-dissolves" thread) said of Archbishop Elpidophoros of, and I quote:

    "...for His Eminence to then throw his clergy and people under the bus rather than support them is a special kind of terrible..."

    This, after accusing him of of false theological and moral reasoning, naturally asserting your reasoning is the Orthodox moral way.

    Instead of throwing a fit, why don't you support your moral reasoning against my rebuttal rather than *simplistically* (and falsely) accusing me of bad faith, mean girl intentions, or whatever is in your mind...or is it *simply* a "special kind of terrible" when other Orthodox folks don't agree with you.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Dear Jake,

    More ad hominems and accusations.
    I’ll be passing up the opportunity of “rebuttal” this time (and for the foreseeable future).
    God Bless you!

    ReplyDelete