Friday, July 1, 2022

Do not play chicken with the Ecumenical Patriarchate

If recent years have taught the world anything, it is that no one should play chicken with the Ecumenical Patriarchate. When patriarchate after patriarchate pulled out of the Crete event, how many people said, "Well, they certainly have to cancel now. At the very least they can't call this meeting pan-Orthodox or binding." Wrong. Or, "There's no way Constantinople is going to step into Ukraine and add confusion to an already precarious situation there." Wrong. Or, "They can't really just dissolve their Western European archdiocese with a letter." Wrong. So, lest you think, "There's no way the Greek Archdiocese is going to make Belya a bishop even as the fate of the Assembly of Bishops hangs in the balance." Know that it is not so much a roll of the dice, but a game of chicken in which one side never, ever veers out of the way to avoid a collision. 


(Orthochristian) - Archbishop Elpidophoros and the Patriarchate of Constantinople consider that the allegations against Alexander Belya, a defrocked former archimandrite of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia, lack any proof, and thus they intend to proceed with his consecration to the episcopacy later this month.

On June 27, a number of top hierarchs of the jurisdictions of the Canonical Assembly of Orthodox Bishops of the United States of America wrote to Abp. Epidophoros of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America expressing their grave concerns about the Patriarchate’s plans.

Belya was canonically defrocked by ROCOR in February 2020, which the signing hierarchs, representing the OCA and the Antiochian, Serbian, Romanian, and Bulgarian Churches in America, all recognize as canonically binding.

However, to avoid his investigation and canonical deposition, Belya fled to GOARCH, where he created a Slavic Vicariate, which is mainly made up of defrocked, suspended, and schismatic priests.

GOARCH announced last month that the Holy Synod of Constantinople had elected Belya to become a GOARCH auxiliary bishop, overseeing the Slavic Vicariate. The hierarchs from the various Canonical Assembly jurisdictions warned Abp. Elpidophoros that if Belya becomes a bishop and thus a member of the Canonical Assembly, they will be forced to quit the Assembly, and thus Orthodox unity in America faces a serious threat.

However, in his response letter dated June 29, Abp. Elpidophoros argues that the election of Belya was announced to the Assembly hierarchs on May 16, “and no one said anything or expressed any concerns nor opposition at the time.”

A copy of the letter was sent to all hierarchs of the Assembly of Canonical Bishops.

The GOARCH head writes that the Assembly of Canonical Bishops is a place for fostering Orthodox unity, but this unity also hinges upon each jurisdiction maintaining its independence, as stated in the Assembly bylaws and in the decisions of 2016’s Council of Crete. Thus, Abp. Elpidophoros argues, “the decisions by the Ecumenical Patriarchate to allow the creation of a Slavic Orthodox Vicariate in America and to elect His Grace Bishop-Elect Alexander Belya of Nicopolis adhere to the same rule that applies to other Orthodox Churches in the country with vicariates or ethnic dioceses.”

“In light of the above, even the use of the Assembly’s stationery for your correspondence could be considered inappropriate and in contradiction with the mission of the Assembly,” the Archbishop continues. I thought so, too. If you want to speak for the Antiochian Archdiocese or even a band of jurisdictions, use your own stationary.

He assures the hierarchs that he has heard their concerns, but he finds them without merit, as the Patriarchate of Constantinople thoroughly examined all documents and evidence relating to Belya before receiving him into GOARCH.

Notably, Abp. Elpidophoros claims that Belya received a canonical release from the late Metropolitan Hilarion (Kapral), the former First Hierarch of ROCOR.

However, this is disputed by the fact that Belya was defrocked by the ROCOR Holy Synod even after he had fled to GOARCH. Thus, ROCOR still considered Belya to be a priest under its own canonical authority. Does this mean Belya was in the GOA and when ROCOR knew he had changed jurisdictions, they went ahead and defrocked him? If that's the order of things, it's hardly the same as the GOA accepting a defrocked priest.

But Abp. Elpidophoros never received any communication from Met. Hilarion to this effect, he writes.

The GOARCH Archbishop then turns to the war in Ukraine, with accusations against Assembly hierarchs:

I had hoped that the current war and unjust aggression by the Russian Federation in Ukraine would have created a sense of solidarity and justice among us and recommitted us all to Orthodox unity in America. Regrettably, we witnessed the opposite effect, so that many of our brothers were unable to condemn the cruelty of this unjust and illegal war, and even worse, sought to silence the Assembly from speaking out against these horrific and unchristian actions.

Abp. Elpidophoros concludes with a call and prayer for greater unity and cooperation.

Also note that Belya even sued Met. Hilarion and a number of other ROCOR hierarchs and clerics in the secular court system, which is a violation of the sacred canons of the Orthodox Church. The case is ongoing.

***

Read the full text of Abp. Elpidophoros’ letter:

Your Eminence,

I greet you warmly with a salutation of peace and love in our Lord, God and Savior Jesus Christ.

It is with great sadness and some surprise that I received your letter dated June 27, 2022. As you may recall, I had announced the recent election of His Grace Bishop-Elect Alexander Belya of Nicopolis by the Holy and Sacred Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, as well as his upcoming ordination during our last executive committee meeting of the Assembly on May 16, 2022, and no one said anything or expressed any concerns nor opposition at the time.

The Assembly of Bishops is a unique place where Orthodox unity is fostered. In the 2020 Vision document, we all insisted that: “We commit ourselves to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace (Ephesians 4:3) by adhering to the principles of canonical order, of liturgical concelebration, and pastoral cooperation on every level of our Church life.” However, our work towards unity is contingent on our ability to preserve our independence, as our bylaws suggest: “The decisions of the Assembly shall not interfere with the responsibility of each Bishop for his eparchial jurisdiction, or restrict the rights of his Church...” (Bylaws, section 1.5). The same prescription was also repeated in the decision of the Holy and Great Council of Crete (2016) on “The Orthodox Diaspora.” Thus, the decisions by the Ecumenical Patriarchate to allow the creation of a Slavic Orthodox Vicariate in America and to elect His Grace Bishop-Elect Alexander Belya of Nicopolis adhere to the same rule that applies to other Orthodox Churches in the country with vicariates or ethnic dioceses. In light of the above, even the use of the Assembly’s stationery for your correspondence could be considered inappropriate and in contradiction with the mission of the Assembly.

Dear Brother, I have always been completely transparent with you and all our brother hierarchs with regard to the incardination and recent election of His Grace Bishop-Elect Alexander Belya of Nicopolis. I have heard your concerns, however, having received all the necessary documentation, including a valid release letter from the late Metropolitan Hilarion, and in absence of tangible proof of misconduct, based on our very thorough diligence process—and not on rumors—his canonical incardination was processed.

Furthermore, I have never received any correspondence from our beloved brother the late Metropolitan Hilarion, of blessed memory, of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (ROCOR) regarding issues with the then V. Rev. Archimandrite Alexander Belya. In comparable circumstances, I have always preferred direct contact and an open line of communication, just as we have had many opportunities to work collaboratively in the past. On the contrary, the Moscow Patriarchate and ROCOR have decided to withdraw from their participation in the work and life of the Assembly of Bishops over the jurisdictional situation in Ukraine. I had hoped that the current war and unjust aggression by the Russian Federation in Ukraine would have created a sense of solidarity and justice among us and recommitted us all to Orthodox unity in America. Regrettably, we witnessed the opposite effect, so that many of our brothers were unable to condemn the cruelty of this unjust and illegal war, and even worse, sought to silence the Assembly from speaking out against these horrific and unchristian actions.

Your Eminence, Orthodox unity is vital a priority of my ministry in this country and the Assembly is the essential vehicle for such unity. The many accomplishments over the last past years, the spirit of fraternal synergy and the collaboration that brought us together during the time of the pandemic, and the various missions through the agencies and organizations that rely on the Assembly for auspices should be our focus. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that the Assembly continues its work, and it is my fervent prayer that you will sustain your commitment to this mission inasmuch as our witness in America is so dearly needed.

Praying that the Lord of mercy and compassion will inspire us to walk together on the way towards deeper communion, with unity being our ultimate witness to Christ’s sacrificial love, I remain


With fraternal love in Christ,


+ ELPIDOPHOROS

Archbishop of America

6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here even EP/Goarch (same thing) falls back to a "Federation" ecclesiology when it suits them. The complainers do have a problem, a "ethnarchs for me but not for thee" hypocrisy, though they are right that the continued creation of them is an unsustainable fragmentation.

    Everyone sees the problem that the status quo is not working (to some degree), but no one is willing to lay down the tools-in-hand (i.e. the so called "canonical" status quo) and actually do ("be") anything different.

    At some point (20, 30, 50 years from now?) every jurisdiction will be a cafeteria of ethnarchs, each containing all the others. Thank God Orthodoxy in America is shrinking (currently at 180,000 Sunday going souls and falling) because only in weakness will these absurdities be turned around...

    ReplyDelete
  3. So why didn't these bishops express their concerns on May 16 at the assembly when Belya's election as bishop was announced? Waiting almost six weeks later to complain is bizarre. Something's fishy here. It sounds to me that quite possibly Moscow is pulling some strings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you not get it, Joseph? The Ecumenical Patriarch and his associates are, provably, on the payroll of the State Department and globalists. They're fomenting division, violently robbing canonical priests and parishes and openly express union with Francis and his handlers in Rome. What's bizarre is they haven't gone the way of Arius, yet. Gives me a stomach ache just thinking about it!

      Delete
  4. "Does this mean Belya was in the GOA and when ROCOR knew he had changed jurisdictions, they went ahead and defrocked him? If that's the order of things, it's hardly the same as the GOA accepting a defrocked priest."

    The coverage elsewhere (at Orthochristian and my own recollection) indicates that Belya was suspended at the time he went to the GOA. Suspension is almost always a precursor to a clergyman being deposed even as suspension does not always lead to deposition. If he was, in fact, suspended, then he wouldn't be allowed to transfer anywhere under the regular rules. (Who would want a priest NOT in "good standing"?)

    As to the delay in the hierarchs saying anything, it's super common for troublesome things to be said among bishops who are not close as brethren and to receive a delayed response. This is especially true if those with objections wish to form a united response as part of their "intervention." This aspect of the response strikes me as disingenuous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My understanding is that he was suspended because the ROCOR parish he served in Florida followed him in going under the GOA. If that's the case, then his suspension is a complete double standard. Since 2019, ROCOR has robbed people and priests from GOA also.

      It would actually make the most sense if all of ROCOR went under the EP also. Well, at least that way they wouldn't have to merge in America with the "dreaded" OCA. With the current U.S. cold war against Russia heating up, ROCOR's days are numbered either way.

      Delete