Friday, October 19, 2012

OCA independent review effort gains traction

I was recently asked to post on the petition being signed by concerned OCA clergy and laity. The petition can be found here. Below is the text of the petition. I was also recently asked as to where the Bp. Matthias misconduct investigation currently stands. After the recent release of text messages purportedly from the woman lodging the complaint I have heard nothing further that I can responsibly repost.


We, Orthodox Christians of North America, appeal to the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church in America (OCA) and to the Seventeenth All American Council of the OCA with a request to investigate events that appear to be improper and to have occurred in relation to the removal of Metropolitan Jonah as Primate of the Orthodox Church in America.

We ask for an independent investigation of the following.
  1. Whether it is against the OCA Statute for the bishops to request and/or accept a resignation of their Primate since resignation is different from retirement mentioned in the Statute of the OCA.
  2. Whether three bishops of the OCA, +Benjamin, +Nikon, and +Tikhon, met privately, banding together, on or about July 5th of 2012, without participation or knowledge of their Primate, Metropolitan Jonah, in violation of three of the Holy Canons, and agreed (conspired) to request his resignation as the Primate of the OCA.
  3. Whether this meeting was followed by telephone calls to some of the other bishops of the OCA to secure their acquiescence to the conspiracy.
  4. Whether the Chancellor of the OCA, Fr. John Jillions, misinformed Metropolitan Jonah on July 6th of 2012 about the above mentioned event, telling him that ALL BISHOPS of the Holy Synod of the OCA unanimously request his resignation.
  5. Whether, following the resignation (through obedience and conciliation) of Metropolitan Jonah, the bishops of the Holy Synod failed to meet to discuss the situation and take appropriate measures but, instead, communicated via a teleconference, without physically coming together for prayer and free deliberation.
  6. Whether the Holy Synod unlawfully appointed a locum tenens of the Archdiocese of Washington despite the fact that Metropolitan Jonah did not resign or retire as the bishop of that archdiocese.
  7. Whether on or about July 16th of 2012 Bishops Matthias, Michael, Alexander, and Tikhon published letters with untruthful and incorrect information, which was meant to damage the reputation of Metropolitan Jonah. These four substantially identical letters purportedly explained the reasons for asking the Metropolitan to resign.
  8. Whether other OCA bishops and/or OCA officials or employees participated in publishing a substantially identical letter on the OCA web site, under the typed signature “The Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church in America,” which was widely publicized in national and international media.
  9. Whether other OCA bishops, priests, and employees consistently conspired to remove Metropolitan Jonah as the Primate of the OCA.
We further request that the detailed results of the investigation be made known to the Orthodox Faithful and that appropriate measures in accordance with the Holy Canons be executed based on the results of this investigation. These suspected events may involve several bishops and priests of the OCA; therefore, we ask that help from other autocephalous Orthodox churches be employed to assist in the investigation. This may involve appointing an independent investigative group or committee composed of or including members of canonical Orthodox churches other than the OCA.

We further appeal for assistance to all the heads of all autocephalous Orthodox Churches, and to the bishops of the Assembly of Canonical Orthodox Bishops of North and Central America, to provide such help in both the investigative process and that of remediation. We ask for appropriate conclusions to be derived on the basis of the results of the investigation. Should the current OCA leadership refuse to undertake an independent investigation or make the results public, we ask you to help the Orthodox Christians of North America by initiating an independent investigation on your own.

We emphasize that this petition does not constitute an accusation of any church body or any individual(s) but presents a request for investigation and remediation through proper canonical procedures.

5 comments:

  1. Why on earth would you comply with a divisive request of this nature?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A fair question. I sat on the request for a while and decided that people can weight the merits of it on their own. It's certainly a lot less inflammatory than a lot of the other posts on the topic I've read recently. The synod can ignore it or act on it as they see fit.

      Delete
  2. It's not divisive if it's true. That's what the point of the independent review is. As Archbishop Job of blessed memory asked during the last time of troubles for the OCA "is it true or is it not?" If it is not true, those who have brought up such serious allegations should be publicly censured for slanderous gossip and held to account and pressed for repentance, but If it is true, we are looking at some VERY serious charges and they will need to be dealt with. Looking the other way and pretending there isn't a problem won't work, but could very well be detrimental to the faith of many who are attempting to go to church and pray, not to mention those who are contemplating entrance into the Church of Jesus Christ. For all parties, we should pray and offer supplication to the Lord who told us that "You are Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." May God have mercy on us, our country, and our Church and may all that needs to come to light be illumined now, while there is still time to repent, before we will all face the Dread Judgement Seat of Christ and answer for what all of our words, thoughts and deeds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First of all, it can be both true and divisive.

      But independent of that, this is not how canons or the Church function - the "serious charges" appear to be largely in the minds of a handful of overheated folks. If this is what they need to exorcise their own demons, so be it. However, there's no need to draw attention to it.

      In any case, if folks latch on to this last bit we will all be better off: "For all parties, we should pray and offer supplication to the Lord who told us that "You are Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." May God have mercy on us, our country, and our Church and may all that needs to come to light be illumined now, while there is still time to repent, before we will all face the Dread Judgement Seat of Christ and answer for what all of our words, thoughts and deeds."

      Delete
  3. The place for this discussion to be held is at the OCA Sobor or "All American Council" not on internet petitions. It is an internal OCA matter and can be discussed by members of the OCA at their own sobor. That is proper procedure. A delegate can stand up and introduce a recommendation. After it is seconded then there can be discussion among members of the OCA.

    ReplyDelete