Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I'm confused. Have the twenty monasteries of Mount Athos reversed their position on this?
ReplyDeletehttp://orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/mono_athos.aspx
The author of Orthodoxinfo.com is a bit fanatical and doesn't understand the truth. The simole matter is that Coptic Orthodox Church is NOT a monophysite Church. They ARE fully Orthodox and their very liturgy clearly states that the Lord made His Humanity One with His Divinity, without mingling, alteration, comixture, confusion, or separation. If they confess this then they are Orthodox.
DeleteThere's no contradiction. When seeing a story like this, one realizes that, all along, such statements like the one you linked are not reactionary but written with genuine love.
ReplyDeleteThe article clearly states that there was no joint prayer service, only visits,diaglogue, and greetings. This is true ecumenism, not the heresy of the Phanar.
ReplyDelete