Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I ignore, as a rule, anything the mainstream media has to say about the Bishop of Rome. Whether its casting Pius XII as a "traditionalist" (he wasn't), portraying John XXIII as a "liberal" (he wasn't), or anything Frankie says, they are very good at twisting a few points to fill their narrative.
ReplyDeleteAs Catholics, Orthodox, orthodox Catholics, and catholic Orthodox, let's focus on what is actually happening and not the spin that some idiot with a Journalism degree puts to it.