As I mentioned earlier, there is already a canonical Church in Macedonia and Bulgarian efforts to make canonical this uncanonical group separate from Ohrid or the Serbian Patriarchate is contrary to the way we do things. I am all for healing, but this goes against canonical order. Qatar should be a bright flashing warning sign to the Church of Bulgaria.
(orthochristian.com) - The Holy Synod of the Greek Orthodox Church held its December session yesterday and today, under the chairmanship of His Beatitude Archbishop Ieronymos of Athens and All Greece, at which it addressed the communiqué of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church on its decision to become the “Mother Church” of the schismatic Macedonian Orthodox Church, reports Romfea.
In addressing the Bulgarian Church’s November 29 decision to assume the role of “Mother Church” of the Macedonian Church, the Greek Holy Synod expressed its concern yesterday about the fact that the Bulgarian Church is thereby intervening in the jurisdiction of another Local Church, namely the Serbian Orthodox Church, from which the Macedonian Church schismed. In the Greek Church’s estimation, this constitutes an act contrary to the sacred canons and the Tradition of the Church.
The Macedonian Church asked the Bulgarian Church in November to establish “Eucharistic communion with the renewed Ohrid Archbishopric,” asking that that the Macedonian Church be recognized as autocephalous.
Having examined the letter of Archbishop Stephan of the MOC, the Bulgarian Synod resolved that, inasmuch as the MOC has expressed its willingness and desire to accept the BOC as its Mother Church, the BOC is prepared to take on the sacred duty of interceding and advocating for the MOC with the other Local Orthodox Churches throughout the world, taking every necessary step to establish its canonicity.
The Holy Synod of the Serbian Orthodox Church also expressed its bewilderment and concern at the recent actions of the Bulgarian Church. Meeting on November 27, the Synod stated that it “was surprised by the decision of the Bulgarian Patriarchate” and that they “hope that the Synod in Sofia will adhere to the canonical order, given that the Archbishopric of Ohrid, headed by Archbishop Jovan (Vraniskovski) is the legitimate canonical Church in Macedonia, and this is acknowledged even by the European Court of Human Rights.”
Such intervention is, the Greek Synod argues, the right of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, and could be the beginning of difficult developments.
The Greek Holy Synod expressed its desire that prudence will prevail and that the decision of the Bulgarian Church will not be finalized.
Posts
TBH, what is done in Macedonia is pretty much the way most of the Churches gained autocephaly.
ReplyDeleteMost Americans think of Macedonians in the FYROM as being an offshoot of Serbian, I think, but its language is most closely related to Bulgarian.
ReplyDelete"The modern Macedonian language belongs to the eastern group of the South Slavic branch of Slavic languages in the Indo-European language family, together with Bulgarian and the extinct Old Church Slavonic. Macedonian's closest relative is Bulgarian, with which it has a high degree of mutual intelligibility. The next closest relative is Serbo-Croatian. Language contact between Macedonian and Serbo-Croatian reached its height during Yugoslav times, when most Macedonians learned Serbo-Croatian as a compulsory language of education and knew and used Serbian (or "pseudo-Serbian", i.e. a mixture of Serbian and Macedonian)."
That is, this is yet another example of the ongoing, endemic sin of nationalism. (In addition to Qatar/Antioch/Jerusalem, the Orthodox bishops in Canada wouldn't even sit down in the same Episcopal Assembly as the Orthodox bishops in America because of how different Canada and Canadian Orthodox is from the U.S. and American Orthodoxy - when most of them on both sides of the border report up to the same overseas mother churches! Please.)
I'm curious. How is Canadian-based Orthodoxy different from America's?
ReplyDeleteExactly.
ReplyDelete