Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
They'll fight until you kill them. And when you kill them, they'll stop fighting.
ReplyDeletePerhaps a contest between the sins of the religion of peace and the sins of thos who profess the religion of love is in order. It won't go well for either.
ReplyDeleteWhat sins have the Copts committed to stack up against being murdered in their own country by their fellow Egyptians? Or are we going to rehash the Crusades again, themselves a response to Arab invasion? Or do you think there was just empty land there before Mohammed?
ReplyDelete