Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Are things tied up now?

When two Carpatho-Rusyn priests under the EP left for ROCOR it was widely seen as laudable. When two ROCOR priests leave for GOARCH it's “betraying the trust and love of his archpastors" apparently.

Regardless of where you stand on these jurisdictional shifts, it's received as a scandal by the faithful.


(orthochristian.com) - Last month, the Eastern American Diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia announced that Archimandrite Alexander Belya, “betraying the trust and love of his archpastors, led the Cathedral of Blessed Matrona of Moscow in Dania Beach, FL, and St. Nicholas Monastery in North Fort Myers, FL, out of the structure of the canonical authority of the Russian Orthodox Church.”

Belya and his brother Ivan were under investigation for a number of serious accusations, and it is known that Alexander attempted to get himself confirmed as a bishop of ROCOR by the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church, despite the fact that he had not been nominated by the ROCOR hierarchs. He was actually confirmed I believe, but this was rescinded when ROCOR informed Moscow that they had not made any such request.

Alexander ignored his suspension and continued serving, now commemorating Archbishop Elpidophoros of the Greek Archdiocese of America of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. He also announced that the Greek Archdiocese had taken control of the parish.

Unfortunately, the situation has repeated itself in New York, this time with Archpriest Alexander Belya, the father of Archimandrite Alexander and Ivan.

On October 24/November 6, on behalf of the Eastern American Diocese, Metropolitan Hilarion (Kapral), the First Hierarch of ROCOR, issued a notice stating,

It is our sorrowful duty to confirm to parishioners and friends of Saint John the Forerunner Cathedral in Brooklyn, New York, that the suspended Archpriest Alexander Belya, formerly rector of the parish, turning his back on his native and persecuted Ukrainian Orthodox Church, with whom the Russian Church Abroad is in full accord, has uncanonically departed from his ecclesiastical obedience and, in defiance of all Church order, illegitimately fled to the homophorion of a hierarch of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, with which we are not presently in communion. As ROCOR did with the ACROD clergy when they sought no canonical release and would not accept one when offered, but instead took both men in without any paperwork.

This flight represents a violation of the vows given at his ordination and “has necessarily resulted in his canonical suspension from all canonical and administrative duties,” Met. Hilarion writes.

A full and final decision will be rendered by a spiritual court in the future.

“The Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia laments this sorrowful betrayal of his Church and of his flock by the suspended Archpriest Alexander, who has placed himself in collaboration with a diocese external to the Church Abroad, which has no canonical or legal authority whatsoever to legitimize this schismatic act,” the notice reads.

Met. Hilarion also warns his flock “that following such individuals into schism or receiving sacraments from their hands is to place one’s own soul in profound peril,” calling on the faithful to begin attending other ROCOR parishes.

In conclusion, Met. Hilarion writes:

We urge the faithful of Saint John the Forerunner Cathedral to remain steadfast in this time of trial, secure in the knowledge that our Diocese and our Church will not leave its God-preserved flock destitute or uncared-for in the face of this sorrow. We do not put our trust “in princes or in the sons of men, in whom there is no salvation,” as the Psalmist says, but in God Who is undivided and always protects those who abhor schism and personal gain, remaining steadfast spiritual children of our beloved Church.

13 comments:

  1. While one can pehaps criticize the priests who left ACROD for not taking a release, these situations aren't analogous. So far as is publicly known, the ACROD priests left as a matter of conscience. The Belyas left ROCOR only after their insanely audacious attempt to fraudently make one of theirs a bishop was stopped. This raises obvious questions about what corrupt connections in Moscow made them think they could get away with it, and this very much reflects poorly on the MP that such a situation could happen, but it reflects even worse on the EP that they would knowingly take in these mafiosi.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The two ACROD priests left because their Hierarchs became schismatics. Apples and oranges.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I mean, Belya and Co. left ROCOR because they didn't manage to fraudulently get one of their own consecrated a Bishop. The ACROD Priests left on principle. This is a silly comparison.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Principle", what principle of conscience was involved? Honest question - anyone of a link.

    The Mikalian propaganda bot spits out "ssschismatticeeessss" again of course, but what's the real story?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Father, for perhaps some "balance", please consider posting the letters posted on the Russian Cathedral's website in NYC.

    As for things being "tied up", in this battle I don't really see any winners, only losers. I can assure you that tgis is not only a scandal for the faithful, but also for those who desire to become Orthodox and are being told conflicting things and who lack the context to figure it out on their own.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think there’s a pretty obvious difference between leaving when you believe your bishop has violated canon law and is joining with defrocked schismatics that he previously acknowledged as excommunicated and defrocked and being under the jurisdiction of another bishop, before suddenly changing his mind without any satisfactory explanation other than ‘I do what I want’; and the entirely insincere act of forging a letter of recommendation to become a bishop, getting caught, and then immediately fleeing the consequences by jumping ship.

    It shows a continued record of poor judgement that the GOA would accept such dubious persons, and like many jurisdictions i’m sure they’ll come to regret accepting others out of spite when these rogue clergy inevitably get up to fresh shenanigans to put it politely. (To be clear I know the GOA isn’t the only group to have made poor judgement calls in these kinds of situations, but this is a pretty blatant case, nevertheless its sadly common in the US).

    ReplyDelete
  7. It should be noted that I have seen nothing pointing to the Greek Archdiocese having agreed to anything.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excellent point, I forgot to inquire as to whether or not we had actually heard of an official acceptance. Again, regardless of how you feel about the Ukraine situation, looking at this situation on its own merits, It would seem rather foolish to accept someone who just attempted to make themselves a bishop and jumped ship when it didn’t work, and expect them to behave better in your jurisdiction.

      Delete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What is the canonical basis for stating "leaving the authority of your bishop, without a canonical release, as a matter of conscience," and "leaving the authority of your bishop, without a canonical release, to escape canonical censure" are different?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As a matter of canonical (or any other type) of Law, they are the same.

      Delete
    2. Well the only time its permissible to disobey a hierarch or break away is if you cannot follow them in good faith/conscience. Its up to a spiritual court to decide if you were correct in doing so.

      Whereas the Belyas were caught redhanded attempting to gain authority in the church by fraud and refused to accept the consequences of getting caught.

      Again regardless of how you feel about the Ukraine situation etc this is a pretty clear cut case of clergy gone rogue. But I am curious to see an official statement or confirmation of whether or not the GOA actually accepted them. I suspect they did but id be happy to hear otherwise.

      Delete
  10. It's like the good ol' days when ROCOR or its clergy's fingerprints were all over every schism and vagante jurisdiction in world Orthodoxy, each more traditionalist and True Orthodox than the next. Ironically, a very modern spirit of sectarianism fueled by cheap printing, mailing lists, and then various early online forums.

    ReplyDelete