We're going the wrong direction


Comments

  1. James Ignatius McAuleyFebruary 24, 2020 at 2:43 PM

    Well posted, father. No children, no future.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BorisJojicjFebruary 24, 2020 at 4:31 PM

    Guess who are having a lot of children? Our non-alcohol drinking friends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JamesFebruary 25, 2020 at 10:19 AM

      This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  3. BorisJojicjFebruary 25, 2020 at 11:22 AM

    Well, that could be on of them. They abstain from meat also, if I'm not mistaken

    ReplyDelete
  4. BorisJojicjFebruary 25, 2020 at 11:26 AM

    Now that I think about it, the Finnish Apostolic Lutherans are both anti-alcohol and anti-birth control. Also, women are forbidden to wear pants and cut their hair(doubtless, some traditional Orthodox would support these two items).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lug DukhovnyFebruary 26, 2020 at 5:53 AM

    @James - he could also be referring to the conservative Mennonites. Huge families, anti-alcohol.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lug DukhovnyFebruary 26, 2020 at 5:55 AM

    @Boris - Traditional Orthodox, as in canonical or non-canonical? Are you speaking of Old Believers?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Donna FarleyFebruary 26, 2020 at 9:41 AM

    Has nobody noticed that the kid with 'My Mom', who is apparently a boy, grew up to be the "Me' who is pretty clearly female?

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Anti-GnosticFebruary 26, 2020 at 10:06 AM

    The future belongs to those who show up. It will be more religious.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Response to “On administering Holy Communion in a Time of a Plague”

This was sent to me and deserves a read. You can read the Calivas article here . We can all agree that we are living in unusual times. However, the nature and extent of the illness that we face, and the proper response of the Church, is a matter of much disagreement. We have seen various responses to the COVID-19 epidemic: calls to close our Churches as infectious vectors, and demands to open them as places of spiritual healing. Directives a) ordering the cessation of sacramental life as part of an effort to “flatten the curve,” and cries for access to the divine grace that flows forth from those very mysteries; b) calling for the restriction of “at-risk persons,” and serious questions about the validity of such controls, c) instructions to liturgists to wear personal protective equipment during the celebration of the divine services and the distribution of the holy Mysteries, and uncertainty about the fitness of such practices. Who has been championing what and on behalf of whom? The ...
Read more

Sr. Vassa: There's no ontological impediment to priestesses

Image
Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Read more