Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
It is sad to see "legal representative" in a post about Christians attempting to resolve and reconcile issues that are purely within the boundaries of Church polity. For 2000 years of history and leading by the Spirit we're still Corinthians. Sigh.
ReplyDeleteBlasphemy, s-p!!! Jonah would never make a mistake!!!
Delete;)
This is really disturbing. Unless there is an extremely unusual explanation for this I would say that Jonah is making it abundantly clear that he was/is unfit for the episcopacy. I seem to recall that there are church canons which forbid this sort of thing.
ReplyDeleteJohn, Metr. mad it clear he was unfit for the episcopacy WHILE he was metropolitan. Why can't he just do the right thing and retire to a monastery and end his life in prayer there?
ReplyDelete