Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
in my opinion it is time to fish or cut bait - logic dictates that the moscow parishes came out of the metropolia and most have galician roots as do most of the oca parishes so a return to the oca would make most sense. st nicks can become the moscow representation church in the usa -- in fact to to its age and significance - the mother church - if you will
ReplyDeletejoining with the oca would be of benefit to both
You mean the Metropolia came out of Moscow Parishes.
DeleteGood question. The only answer I can think of is that it is congruent with the Tomos and the Act of Canonical Communion. If ROCOR and the MP parishes could become a Ethnic Diocese in the OCA than that might take away the fear of losing their identity.
ReplyDelete