Edward Pentin with the National Catholic Register has written an article that is head and shoulders above its contemporaries on the topic of the upcoming Council in Crete. It delves into the broader topics but also the players involved. I recommend it wholeheartedly.
VATICAN CITY (NCR) — The historic meeting between Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill of Moscow in Havana Feb. 12 — the first such encounter since the Russian Orthodox Church was founded in the 10th century — would probably not have happened were it not for another historic upcoming meeting: the Pan-Orthodox Council. He's not alone in thinking this. Editorials on this point range from delight at the Holy Spirit working among us to chagrin that the Russian Church is trying to show up Constantinople.
The leaders of all Orthodox Churches will gather June 16-27 for the first time since 787. Over the succeeding 12 centuries, there have been councils of various levels attended by representatives of various Churches, but this will be the first Pan-Orthodox Council attended by all Orthodox leaders. "Diaspora" representation so far looks woefully inadequate and, for those who support the tomos of autocephaly granted to the OCA, incomplete.
The meeting, which has been years in the making and was originally planned for Istanbul, will now take place in Greek-Orthodox Crete, which falls under the jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. The heads of the autocephalous, or self-governing, Orthodox Churches (there is not universal agreement among the Orthodox about the precise number of such local Churches) decided on most of the final details of the council at a meeting, called a “Synaxis of Primates,” at the end of January in Chambésy, Switzerland. Why Crete? Because of the strained relations between Russia and Turkey making assurances that Russian hierarchs would be allowed to enter the country questionable.
The council is a fruit of much work carried out by local Orthodox Churches for more than 50 years, but expectations are fairly muted. Speaking in Moscow Feb. 2, Patriarch Kirill stressed that the council, which will only last 12 days, will not be like “ancient ecumenical councils,” and it is “not called to make decisions on doctrinal issues because such were made long ago and are not subject to revision.” He also stressed it is not aimed at introducing “any innovation in the liturgical life of the Church and her canonical order.” Some people consider this to be the first in a regular series of synaxese where the Church will come together to discuss timely topics. Others feel this is a one-and-done event. Still others see this as a dipping of the toe into the warm water with more substantive conciliar actions to come if this goes off without a burned big toe.
What it will do, he added, is become “an important factor” in building “inter-church unity and cooperation” and contribute to the “clarification of the responses that the Orthodox Church gives to challenges of today on the basis of her age-old Tradition.”
In an interview with the Register in 2014, Metropolitan Hilarion Alfeyev of Volokolamsk, chairman of the Russian Orthodox Department of External Church Relations, explained that a pan-Orthodox Council would not be an Orthodox equivalent of the Second Vatican Council “because their agendas are utterly different”; and the Russian Orthodox, at least, “do not expect it to introduce any reforms making a substantial impact on the life of Orthodoxy.”