Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
v-i-c-t-o-r-y! oh wait..that's not a swim meet. :/
ReplyDeleteAH! (un)holy cheerleaders. When do they toss Schori?
ReplyDeleteBelieve it or not, Mrs. Schori's done worse:
ReplyDeletehttp://themcj.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/schori31.jpg
MUCH worse:
http://themcj.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/schori.jpg
It looks like football jerseys to me, ay yi yi
ReplyDeleteSince they are showing such bad judgement, lets see if they'll take +Demetri.
ReplyDeleteIt appears that they are from my Alma Mater, the University of Tennessee. That look's like an orange "T" to me. Go Vols!
ReplyDelete