Sr. Vassa: There's no ontological impediment to priestesses
Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Beautiful - for a group of Catholics - HA! HA!
ReplyDeleteThey are Orthodox enough for me!
Thought you might find this amusing.
ReplyDeletehttp://02varvara.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/the-new-uniate-chieftain-sees-his-main-task-as-strengthening-the-unia/
I won't waste a post on it, but I'll say a few quick things...
ReplyDelete1. Met. Hilarion could hardly be called pro-Greek Catholic. His statements over the last few years have been anything but supportive of the very existence of the Church.
2. I'm not wont to rant nor comment much on other people's blogs. I understand that the stridency of my commentary will have no greater effect on the opinions of others than if I politely posit an opinion or two.
3. I'm Orthodox. While I have not always been so the same could be said for much of the people populating the Church in the New World. I trust no one holds this fact against me.
LOL.
ReplyDeleteThe lady doth protest too much, methinks.
This is at least the second time she has attempted to crown you with this title. Pretty amusing since she is clearly using you as a "news source" whether she will admit it or not.