Two monks tonsured at Monastery of St. Ephrem

I found this to be an interesting photo of two men being tonsured in the Syrian Orthodox Church. The article (in Arabic) is available here.


Comments

  1. BortAugust 23, 2011 at 4:51 PM

    It appears that one of the men was a priest, since he was wearing a phiro (skull cap). The other man was wearing a blazer, so presumably he was a layman, or perhaps a deacon, subdeacon, or reader.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Byzantine, TXAugust 23, 2011 at 10:54 PM

    A reader asked me to post the below for him:

    "Why should the tonsure of a heretic (monofysite) be of interest to the Orthodox?

    By the way, let me remind you of the following:

    Those who attack the Church of Christ by teaching that Christ's Church is divided into so-called "branches" which differ in doctrine and way of life, or that the Church does not exist visibly, but will be formed in the future when all "branches" or sects or denominations, and even religions will be united into one body; and who do not distinguish the priesthood and mysteries of the Church from those of the heretics, but say that the baptism and eucharist of heretics is effectual for salvation; therefore, to those who knowingly have communion with these aforementioned heretics or who advocate, disseminate, or defend their new heresy of Ecumenism under the pretext of brotherly love or the supposed unification of separated Christians, Anathema!
    (ROCOR)."

    ReplyDelete
  3. BenAugust 24, 2011 at 12:59 AM

    Unfortunately, they are not heretics. Perhaps schismatics, but not heretics:

    "It is the same hypostasis of the Second Person of the Trinity, eternally begotten from the Father Who in these last days became a human being and was born of the Blessed Virgin. This is the mystery of the hypostatic union we confess in humble adoration - the real union of the divine with the human, with all the properties and functions of the uncreated divine nature, including natural will and natural energy, inseparably and unconfusedly united with the created human nature with all its properties and functions, including natural will and natural energy. It is the Logos Incarnate Who is the subject of all the willing and acting of Jesus Christ.

    Also, quoting a local council of a jurisdiction that was at the time in schism with the rest of the church is itself spurious at best. Only an ecumenical council will be able to settle this issue.

    Let me also remind you of the following words from the Gospel according to St. Mark: "And John answered him, saying, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name, and he followeth not us: and we forbade him, because he followeth not us. But Jesus said, "Don't stop him, because no one who works a miracle in my name can slander me soon afterwards.For he that is not against us is on our part."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mor SeverusAugust 26, 2011 at 5:50 PM

    No actual monofysites (?) appear in these photographs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Byzantine, TXAugust 26, 2011 at 6:48 PM

    Let me repost the original blog description that has held unchanged since 2007.

    "Discussions of Eastern Christianity, often with a Byzantine flavor. Posts on the Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox, Eastern Catholic, and even the occasional church of the West."

    I post what is interesting to me and what I believe will be interesting to readers. Sometimes I am surprised by what "catches fire" with readers, but I strive to have something worth looking at when the material presents itself. I am always open to suggestions for future posts and even the future direction of the blog.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sr. Vassa: There's no ontological impediment to priestesses

Image
Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Read more

OCA takes strong stand for canonical Orthodoxy

( Orthochristian.com ) - The primate of the Orthodox Church in America, His Beatitude Metropolitan Tikhon of Washington and All America and Canada, will concelebrate with the primate of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church, His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and All Ukraine, in western Ukraine later this week. The Ukrainian Orthodox Diocese of Chernivtsi and Bukovina “awaits the visit of the primate of the Orthodox Church in America on June 1–2, 2024. Solemn services will be held in the Cathedral of the Descent of the Holy Spirit in Chernivtsi, with the participation of both primates.” The Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church in America formally rejects communion with the schismatics of the “Orthodox Church in Ukraine,” recognizing only the canonical UOC under Met. Onuphry. The Ukrainian primate was the honored guest at the OCA’s 18th All-American Council in July 2015.
Read more

A Response to “On administering Holy Communion in a Time of a Plague”

This was sent to me and deserves a read. You can read the Calivas article here . We can all agree that we are living in unusual times. However, the nature and extent of the illness that we face, and the proper response of the Church, is a matter of much disagreement. We have seen various responses to the COVID-19 epidemic: calls to close our Churches as infectious vectors, and demands to open them as places of spiritual healing. Directives a) ordering the cessation of sacramental life as part of an effort to “flatten the curve,” and cries for access to the divine grace that flows forth from those very mysteries; b) calling for the restriction of “at-risk persons,” and serious questions about the validity of such controls, c) instructions to liturgists to wear personal protective equipment during the celebration of the divine services and the distribution of the holy Mysteries, and uncertainty about the fitness of such practices. Who has been championing what and on behalf of whom? The ...
Read more