Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
This is one of the reasons why I will never go to a Roman Mass in the Ordinary Form anymore. Only in the Extraordinary Form or the Byzantine Divine Liturgy. The Roman Mass in the Ordinary Form still has serious defects. #1 the rubrics, not being strictly enforced by Rome!. Call me what you will but the current Ordinary Form created by Bugnini is a joke!!. Celebrated by ignorant Latin priests like this example.
ReplyDeleteThis is another reason why the Orthodox are very reluctant to give the Roman papacy any more power than a first among equals. The Pope can't even control his own clergy.
ReplyDeleteI hope this priest and those "concelebrating" loose their faculties to offer any form of Mass. They deserve it!.
ReplyDeletePope Benedict abdicated TOO SOON!!!!!
ReplyDeleteJust my humble, Orthodox opinion.