Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI looked at this site. It shows one of the most disturbing developments in modern American Protestantism, the spreading of Calvinism. Because they believe that they have been specially chosen out of the mass of sinful humanity for salvation, dedicated Calvinist also tend to suffer from extreme spiritual pride. Real dialogue with a convinced Calvinist is impossible because they twist the scriptures to fit their theology. They completely ignore verses that do not support their Calvinism, and even have their own version of Greek in which the words are translated not as a Greek would translate them, but with their meaning defined to fit into their preconceived Calvinist theology.
ReplyDeleteThe person who runs this sight is a former Reformed Baptist pastor who converted to Orthodoxy and has since left Orthodoxy and is now a "Continuing Anglican."
ReplyDeletere: The Filioque ~ Theological Politics nothing more.
ReplyDelete