Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I doubt if these clergy prayed for the prisoners in the truly horrific labour camps in North Korea, but they most certainly should have done.
ReplyDeleteWell if they were following the prescribed rubrics they most certainly would have, albeit in a general sense of praying for those in prison and confinement.
ReplyDeletei hate to say it but chances are the north korean "faithful" are all plants assigned to that task
ReplyDelete^ Have faith!
ReplyDelete