NEW YORK: July 12, 2013 ( ROCOR ) - An Extraordinary Session of the Synod of Bishops is Held On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, an extraordinary session of the Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia was held, presided over by its First Hierarch, His Eminence Metropolitan Hilarion of Eastern America and New York. Participating in the meeting were permanent members of the Synod of Bishops: His Eminence Archbishop Mark of Berlin and Germany; His Eminence Archbishop Kyrill of San Francisco and Western America; His Eminence Archbishop Gabriel of Montreal and Canada, and His Grace Bishop Peter of Cleveland, Administrator of the Diocese of Chicago and Mid-America. Deliberating on the matter of Bishop Jerome of Manhattan, the Synod of Bishops made a decision as follows: “During a meeting of the Synod of Bishops on Wednesday, July 10, 2013, presided over by the First Hierarch of the Russian Church Abroad, A DECISION WAS MADE: on the activities of Bishop Jerome of Ma...
That article is a joke….and very biased. I can’t believe the author implies that the conservative voices may lead to the same problems that were experienced at the second Vatican council. If the Vatican 2 had listened to the traditional voices within their communion, they would not have suffered the deterioration into Protestantism that they face today. The big give away here, was the reference to the arch-ecumenist George Demacoupolos.
ReplyDeleteThere is no need for this council.
Agree with bias and use of references. Disagree on the need for a council.
DeleteI know that I sound like a pessimist. But I am old enough to see what the second Vatican council did to the Latin Catholics (I was born and raised Catholic). Suddenly, a priest who was in exile and whose teachings were banned by Pope Pius XII, was embraced by Pope John XXIII and elevated as the most influential "theologian" on that council (Yves Congar). The rest is history.
DeleteForgive me if I am skeptical, but there are no pernicious heresies to confront at this time that would warrant a council in the Holy Orthodox Church.
Except perhaps the heresy of ecumenism.
There is indeed the heresy of ecumenism that ought to be confronted.
ReplyDeleteAnd perhaps also the attitude that parallel "jurisdictions" within the same territory separated on an ethnic basis is an acceptable and desirable way of organizing the Church -- I seem to recall that it was the Bulgarian desire to have a separate ethnic "jurisidiction" within the territory of the Ecumenical Patriarchate that was condemned as the heresy of ethnophylitism. "Jurisdictionalism" has always struck me as being ethnophylitism-lite rather as monothelitism was monophysitism-lite.