Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Is there an Anglo-American Orthodox Church?
ReplyDeleteWhy not?
There is the OCA
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/yQ8ohuIaKCU
DeleteI am part of the UOC, and almost went to this Sobor. Unfortunately, the whole "Strategic Plan" idea is one borrowed from the Corporate world and IMO does not really work for the Church. It leads to vague/compromised language around "compassion" and "service" that is too similar to the social gospel of the protestants...
ReplyDelete