Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Axios. Many years
ReplyDeleteI can't remember: is St. Nicholas Cathedral the original old-time cathedral in Chicago or the new parish that was established in the late 1960's in protest of the adoption of the new calendar?
ReplyDeleteThe former...
ReplyDeleteGreat! A Greek Catholic bishop who looks just like one of ours, so that any Orthodox person seeing him in the street would go up to him for a blessing.
ReplyDeleteWhat would the papal church say if there were a college in Athens, Sofia, or Moscow which trained cadres of clean shaven, Roman-collared priests to serve the Latin mass and preach in Italian, Spanish, or Portuguese, trying to convince Latins that they were priests of the papal church, when they are not.
That's why I oppose the Western Rite movement in Orthodoxy.