Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
I would say the info on the statement of the statement of his beatitude Arch. Chrysostomos is a little sketchy at the moment, the info comes from this article at Romfra.gr: https://www.romfea.gr/epikairotita-xronika/26631-arxiepiskopos-kuprou-den-biazometha-alla-oute-tha-mpagiatepsei-an-den-kalesoume-amesos-ton-epifanio
ReplyDeleteWhich stated in the article that the statement was taken from questionable sources. From what I could tell a Greek tabloid news outlet.
Still, if this is 100% valid, it would be very unusual, as it contradicts his previous statements on the OCU. http://orthochristian.com/118512.html
I agree. Time will tell...
Delete