Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Well, my hat is off to the Archons for making this statement. While I believe they are dead-wrong in attempting to defend the EP's untenable aberrant ecclesiology, they certainly got this one right.
ReplyDeleteAlthough, I must admit that I can't understand how they could honor the governor of NY State with a human rights award while he admits & celebrates the fact that he was an impetus & promotor of the same legislation they are condemning in this statement.
DeleteMath as never been my strongest subject, but I can't seem to make it add up. Am I missing something?
It's as if the Archons did not research into Cuomo's views before giving him their human rights (!) award. If their background check didn't show Cuomo's pro-abortion stance, one has to wonder what exactly they were rewarding. I think this is just lip service. I am sure the "fans" of the Archons won't even take notice of this "condemnation." Lord, have mercy!
DeleteAlso, a good commentary on Cuomo's approach to "human rights":
Deletehttps://babylonbee.com/news/report-more-unborn-babies-in-new-york-identifying-as-convicted-criminals-so-they-cant-legally-be-executed
No your instincts are on target; seems like churches in the West are not clear where they stand on important matters like life issues. Most be the societal air we breathe!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteShows the danger of the church wading into politics, be wary supporting politicians instead of ideals
ReplyDeleteA Google of Rev. Alexander Karloutsos led me to this video by him titled "Living in a Pluralistic Society". It's only 2 minutes and 15 seconds long, but is a microcosm of the Greek-American philosophy, religion, and way of living with and in secularism:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jq3cNJB2FoE
So much could be said. The pictures of Hillary and Obama in the background, the Niebuhrian "Christ with Culture" answer to religious pluralism (RCism explicitly in this video)in particular and how to live Orthodoxy in the secular culture. It's all so 1960's "Death of God" protestant, and is as Schmemann pointed out, a failure path of compromise that secularizes the Church (and in no way Christianizes the culture).
What Rev. Alexander does not understand is that his "condemnation" of *anything* (including of course this particular one about New York's abortion law) is undermined by his whole way of life, his whole ontology of *being* Christian in the world. Everyone, rather they are Christian (such as myself) or not (such as Hillary and Obama - the New York legislatures - heck, most of the so called "Archons") see how he and most of his fellow communicants have long ago mixed the light with the darkness. Unfortunately for Rev. Alexander, hypocrisy is nothing to stand on and condemn...