Is the male-only priesthood a discipline or essential to the nature of being a priest? Sr. Vassa (again unflinchingly taking up a contentious topic by climbing up the ladder to the highest platform and then jumping into the deep end head first) dives right in and says there is no reason beyond personal preference to not have female clergy. You know, when people ask me about women in priesthood, they say, 'Sister, why can't women be priests?' And I say, 'Women CAN be priests. We don't WANT them to be priests.' Because you see, God can do anything, and the Church, by divine authority, uh, can do anything, but, the Church doesn't want to - and that's a legitimate reason. What I don't like is when we TRY to pretend that there are other reasons for this, because it's legitimate not to want something, and there are reasons not to want this - right? - but, we shouldn't pretent that there's some... reason, that, for example, the maleness...
Simple answer: no.
ReplyDeleteNow take a deep breath and the answer will still be the same.
So the fuss is? What?
I do not understand your meaning Bozo2U
DeleteThe premise of the bill, at it's best, is that human justice for sexually abused people is paramount over every other concern. At worst it is an expression of the secular world's fear and contempt for any body who purports to answer to a higher law.
ReplyDeleteThat the RCC has done serious damage to their own position by violating that higher calling frequently is without doubt.
However, if this bill passed it will be used as a precedent for DAs to investigate any crime including "hate speech" and other ideological "crimes".
Still, the real Church will survive and even thrive if we each actually practice living a repentant life while seeking God fervently.
I have a question? What is the Orthodox practice regarding the privacy of confession?
ReplyDeleteIt's always easy to say no, or I forgot. Probably won't get used very much.
ReplyDeleteTo the cofessor. what is said there is buried there.
ReplyDeleteThank you.
Delete